Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The electrical properties of sealing materials and greases are not defined
or specified. They probably make poor dielectrics when surrounding or are in between transmission line conductors. I wouldn't use the stuff. A few spots of super-glue would be ok. There's no need to run open-wire line through walls and windows via two spaced holes. The building material between the wires will probably be of awful dielectric quality anyway. Just bring the pair of insulated wires close together for a short distance and run them through a single somewhat larger hole lined with a short, pvc or polythene tube. Slope the tube and the line to prevent rainwater from running indoors. When coming through glass or DRY varnished timber a single hole is fine. On high power lines make sure the insulation on the wires where they are close together is thick enough to withstand the high voltage at high SWR. At HF, the discontinuity in Zo due to bringing the wires close together for a few inches, even a foot or more, is absolutely negligeable. And there's nothing wrong with changing from a long open-wire line (outdoors) to a short ladder line to the transmitter (indoors). Use a simple choke balun between the transmitter end of balanced lines and the tuner. The luxury of a balanced tuner is unnecessary. ---- Reg, G4FGQ ==================================== Reg Edwards wrote: Even a 300-ohm twin line with substantial conductors, not the flimsy old TV downlead type, will effect an improvement over the usual sort of coax. 450-ohm ladder line is most popular because of cheapness and relative ease of installation. But for perfectionists, on very long lines, a 5" or 6" spaced 600-ohm work-of-art cannot be bettered. any reason that silicon sealant would not be as good as anything else when fixing (gluing) the wires to the slotted holes of the spacers in a homebrew ladder line? Any reason why this same substance would not be appropriate to seal up the ceramic tubes where such lines go through a wall? this stuff is tough, weather resistant, sticks, and stays flexible. Bill, K6TAJ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It seems to me that the slightly larger single hole through my house wall up
near the peak (which is nothing more than an inch of wood really) is more intrusive than two small spaced holes through which I could insert a 3-4" long old style ceramic insulator tube. There would be a short run of 10 feet to a spot in the ceiling (again nothing more than 1/2" of redwood) into which I could use the same type of ceramic tube, after that it is only a couple more feet to the rig. I do like your idea of angling the tube coming from outside to counter the possible dripping in of moisture (rain), also will put what is called a drip loop in the line before it enters the tubes so the wires are aiming uphill at that point. I already have a balanced tuner on hand so I might as well include the luxury since I have it. I will take your advice and avoid these sealants and use a dab of super glue. In the end, if this line gives me trouble (with the neighbors phones etc.) I will go to coax. But I do want to give this old style balanced line a shot first since there seems to be a handful of operators who do recommend it. 73 Bill K6TAJ Reg Edwards wrote: The electrical properties of sealing materials and greases are not defined or specified. They probably make poor dielectrics when surrounding or are in between transmission line conductors. I wouldn't use the stuff. A few spots of super-glue would be ok. There's no need to run open-wire line through walls and windows via two spaced holes. The building material between the wires will probably be of awful dielectric quality anyway. Just bring the pair of insulated wires close together for a short distance and run them through a single somewhat larger hole lined with a short, pvc or polythene tube. Slope the tube and the line to prevent rainwater from running indoors. When coming through glass or DRY varnished timber a single hole is fine. On high power lines make sure the insulation on the wires where they are close together is thick enough to withstand the high voltage at high SWR. At HF, the discontinuity in Zo due to bringing the wires close together for a few inches, even a foot or more, is absolutely negligeable. And there's nothing wrong with changing from a long open-wire line (outdoors) to a short ladder line to the transmitter (indoors). Use a simple choke balun between the transmitter end of balanced lines and the tuner. The luxury of a balanced tuner is unnecessary. ---- Reg, G4FGQ ==================================== Reg Edwards wrote: Even a 300-ohm twin line with substantial conductors, not the flimsy old TV downlead type, will effect an improvement over the usual sort of coax. 450-ohm ladder line is most popular because of cheapness and relative ease of installation. But for perfectionists, on very long lines, a 5" or 6" spaced 600-ohm work-of-art cannot be bettered. any reason that silicon sealant would not be as good as anything else when fixing (gluing) the wires to the slotted holes of the spacers in a homebrew ladder line? Any reason why this same substance would not be appropriate to seal up the ceramic tubes where such lines go through a wall? this stuff is tough, weather resistant, sticks, and stays flexible. Bill, K6TAJ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeez Reggie,
On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 09:21:12 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards" wrote: The electrical properties of sealing materials and greases are not defined or specified. However... A few spots of super-glue would be ok. I would be MOST curious about the defined properties of this wondrous material. However, super-glue is not a void filler a function which may still need to be performed. Bet let us continue. There's no need to run open-wire line through walls and windows via two spaced holes. The building material between the wires will probably be of awful dielectric quality anyway. seems to contradict: When coming through glass or DRY varnished timber a single hole is fine. On high power lines make sure the insulation on the wires where they are close together is thick enough to withstand the high voltage at high SWR. Which in turn seems to lead to another contradiction: At HF, the discontinuity in Zo due to bringing the wires close together for a few inches, even a foot or more, is absolutely negligeable. Hmm, just about spark gap dimensioning, close to combustibles, High SWR jacked up even higher to boost voltage nodes more (I don't know how the "short" distance ameliorates this - must be in the actuarial tables somewhere). This was certainly the most obscure way of saying don't worry about it. ;-) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) | Antenna | |||
Reflection Delay is it real??? | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna |