Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm living in a wooded area and am trying to hit our club repeater
reliably. It's cloudy now so I'm and getting a bit of ducting but I have a lot of trees, mostly poplars, in the direct path. I would have a line of sight if not for the trees as I'm up enough in altitude. I can cut the trees, they're mine, but finding the right ones is difficult and i don't want to waste the whole grove. I go from keying the repeater with no intelligible signal to not being able to hit it. Today I actually have an S meter reading due to the clouds. I am currently using a J-pole and will put up a Yagi soon but wonder if NVIS would work on 2m? I have only seen references to it being applied in HF. 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan N6SXR |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
'Captain' Kirk DeHaan wrote:
I'm living in a wooded area and am trying to hit our club repeater reliably. It's cloudy now so I'm and getting a bit of ducting but I have a lot of trees, mostly poplars, in the direct path. I would have a line of sight if not for the trees as I'm up enough in altitude. I can cut the trees, they're mine, but finding the right ones is difficult and i don't want to waste the whole grove. Wait for winter and use a beam antenna to locate the tree(s) that need to be trimmed. If a 10 element beam won't "blast" through the trees in the summer, it should get you down to a line of 1 or two trees that need to be cut. A more radio oriented project would be to put a 6m or 10m input on the repeater. 10m should groundwave over the trees anyway. It's easy enough to test. 10m inputs are IMHO neat, at the top of the sunspot cycle, they give your repeater worldwide input. At that point a 10m output would be good too, but for now, it's not much of a problem. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson N3OWJ/4X1GM It's amazing how many people have no clue what the word "contiguous" means. :-( |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 May 2011 18:29:03 +0000 (UTC), Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
10m inputs are IMHO neat, at the top of the sunspot cycle, they give your repeater worldwide input. s/input/QRM/ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 mayo, 20:04, 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan
wrote: I'm living in a wooded area and am trying to hit our club repeater reliably. *It's cloudy now so I'm and getting a bit of ducting but I have a lot of trees, mostly poplars, in the direct path. *I would have a line of sight if not for the trees as I'm up enough in altitude. *I can cut the trees, they're mine, but finding the right ones is difficult and i don't want to waste the whole grove. I go from keying the repeater with no intelligible signal to not being able to hit it. *Today I actually have an S meter reading due to the clouds. I am currently using a J-pole and will put up a Yagi soon but wonder if NVIS would work on 2m? *I have only seen references to it being applied in HF. 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan N6SXR Hello, The repeater antenna will probably have most of its radiation in the horizontal plane and 145 MHz is far above the critical frequency, so your rays will leave earth. Did you monitor the signal for several time (also winter and rain) to assess the real influence of the trees? Do you have any possibility to move the J-pole to another place? As you can open the repeater now and then, some 10 dB additional gain will certainly help you to get above the FM-knee (assuming that you can get the beam at same height as the J-pole. Nice thing is, it will also improve reception. With kind regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl remove abc first in case of PM |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 22, 11:04*am, 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan
wrote: I'm living in a wooded area and am trying to hit our club repeater reliably. *It's cloudy now so I'm and getting a bit of ducting but I have a lot of trees, mostly poplars, in the direct path. *I would have a line of sight if not for the trees as I'm up enough in altitude. *I can cut the trees, they're mine, but finding the right ones is difficult and i don't want to waste the whole grove. I go from keying the repeater with no intelligible signal to not being able to hit it. *Today I actually have an S meter reading due to the clouds. I am currently using a J-pole and will put up a Yagi soon but wonder if NVIS would work on 2m? *I have only seen references to it being applied in HF. 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan N6SXR I can't see that NVIS has any VHF backers. Can you exploit Google Maps, satellite view, to establish a precise line bearing from your antenna to the repeater site? If you need even more help than you get from your new yagi, then such a line bearing will help identify your "trouble trees." I had to do it for a new FD site a few years ago. We're in San Diego and I wanted to work 2m into Los Angeles. First, I used a protractor to determine LA was X-degrees True (whatever it was) from us; next, on a close-up print of the FD site, I plotted that same line bearing from the antenna site to obvious local landmarks which we then used on the the ground for pointing the 2m beam. This is not the only approach, but it got me what I needed. "Sal" (KD6VKW) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/22/2011 3:11 PM, Sal M. Onella wrote:
On May 22, 11:04 am, 'Captain' Kirk wrote: I'm living in a wooded area and am trying to hit our club repeater reliably. It's cloudy now so I'm and getting a bit of ducting but I have a lot of trees, mostly poplars, in the direct path. I would have a line of sight if not for the trees as I'm up enough in altitude. I can cut the trees, they're mine, but finding the right ones is difficult and i don't want to waste the whole grove. I go from keying the repeater with no intelligible signal to not being able to hit it. Today I actually have an S meter reading due to the clouds. I am currently using a J-pole and will put up a Yagi soon but wonder if NVIS would work on 2m? I have only seen references to it being applied in HF. 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan N6SXR I can't see that NVIS has any VHF backers. Can you exploit Google Maps, satellite view, to establish a precise line bearing from your antenna to the repeater site? If you need even more help than you get from your new yagi, then such a line bearing will help identify your "trouble trees." I had to do it for a new FD site a few years ago. We're in San Diego and I wanted to work 2m into Los Angeles. First, I used a protractor to determine LA was X-degrees True (whatever it was) from us; next, on a close-up print of the FD site, I plotted that same line bearing from the antenna site to obvious local landmarks which we then used on the the ground for pointing the 2m beam. For this kind of thing "RadioMobile" from VE2DBE is the application of choice. It will load the SRTM terrain DEMs, etc. and plot out the path quite nicely. http://www.cplus.org/rmw/english1.html But, if you can get in sometimes, but not others, the next question is, "can you hear it"? How long is your coax? If more than 20 ft, are you running a preamp? Getting 10-15 dB gain over a jpole would be easy with a moderate length Yagi. A M2 2M4 (4 elements, $115) is about 10dBi. A 2M9($240) is about 14dBi |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/22/2011 1:04 PM, 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan wrote:
I'm living in a wooded area and am trying to hit our club repeater reliably. It's cloudy now so I'm and getting a bit of ducting but I have a lot of trees, mostly poplars, in the direct path. I would have a line of sight if not for the trees as I'm up enough in altitude. I can cut the trees, they're mine, but finding the right ones is difficult and i don't want to waste the whole grove. I go from keying the repeater with no intelligible signal to not being able to hit it. Today I actually have an S meter reading due to the clouds. I am currently using a J-pole and will put up a Yagi soon but wonder if NVIS would work on 2m? I have only seen references to it being applied in HF. 'Captain' Kirk DeHaan N6SXR Your yagi may fix your problem completely. Other things to consider: * Try moving your existing antenna. Even a small movement may cure the problem as you may have cancelling reflections at times. There is almost always a "sweet spot" somewhere in the vicinity. * Try tilting your antenna to 45 degrees and see if that helps. It might improve reception due to the random polarization of the incoming signal caused by the trees. Note: do this on a day when the signal is either weak or non-existent. You can always apologize for kerchunking. Or, use your S-meter if you have one. Cheers & Good Luck, John KD5YI |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 May 2011 17:55:16 -0500, John KD5YI
wrote: * Try moving your existing antenna. Even a small movement may cure the problem as you may have cancelling reflections at times. There is almost always a "sweet spot" somewhere in the vicinity. I beg to differ. I have about 30 years experience in dealing with propogation through a dense redwood forest (Ben Lomond CA). The trees in my area are about 120ft high. While moving the antenna around may temporarily improve the signal quality by reducing frequency selective fading, multipath, reflections, and just plain bad luck, they do not tend to remain improved. Trees grow and move around. What works well now, will probably not work well tomorrow. I gave up on fixed antenna mounts for my rooftop verticals. (Well, I have one mounted on a tripod, but that was before I realized what was happening). Most of my verticals are mounted on 2x12 planks, held down to the roof with sand bags, concrete blocks, and buckets full of water. Every few months, I move the antennas around to see if I can improve the signals to specific repeaters. * Try tilting your antenna to 45 degrees and see if that helps. It might improve reception due to the random polarization of the incoming signal caused by the trees. I beg to differ again. Tree trunks are mostly water and do an impressive job of simulating a slot type polarization filter at 2m and 440Mhz frequencies. Leaves and branches will pass RF fairly well, but not tree trunks. I've played with both polarizations, circular polarization: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/circular-polarization/ and some diversity reception. Empirically, signals are about 6dB stronger going through the trees vertically polarized, than horizontal. The effect continues up to at least 2.4GHz. Above that, at 5.7GHz, the signals seem to be going through the holes between the leaves. I must admit that I haven't actually tried 45 degrees on 2m or 440Mhz, but I don't think it will help much. Still, it's an easy thing to try. Note: do this on a day when the signal is either weak or non-existent. You can always apologize for kerchunking. Or, use your S-meter if you have one. Do it on a windy day, when the trees are moving around, so you can see how much it will change. Cheers & Good Luck, John KD5YI -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/22/2011 8:26 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sun, 22 May 2011 17:55:16 -0500, John wrote: * Try moving your existing antenna. Even a small movement may cure the problem as you may have cancelling reflections at times. There is almost always a "sweet spot" somewhere in the vicinity. I beg to differ. I have about 30 years experience in dealing with propogation through a dense redwood forest (Ben Lomond CA). The trees in my area are about 120ft high. While moving the antenna around may temporarily improve the signal quality by reducing frequency selective fading, multipath, reflections, and just plain bad luck, they do not tend to remain improved. Trees grow and move around. What works well now, will probably not work well tomorrow. You may be right, Jeff. But he may not have 120ft redwoods around and, after all, this is a temporary fix until his yagi comes in. I gave up on fixed antenna mounts for my rooftop verticals. (Well, I have one mounted on a tripod, but that was before I realized what was happening). Most of my verticals are mounted on 2x12 planks, held down to the roof with sand bags, concrete blocks, and buckets full of water. Every few months, I move the antennas around to see if I can improve the signals to specific repeaters. Good for you! Pat yourself on the back. * Try tilting your antenna to 45 degrees and see if that helps. It might improve reception due to the random polarization of the incoming signal caused by the trees. I beg to differ again. Tree trunks are mostly water and do an impressive job of simulating a slot type polarization filter at 2m and 440Mhz frequencies. Leaves and branches will pass RF fairly well, but not tree trunks. I've played with both polarizations, circular polarization: http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/circular-polarization/ and some diversity reception. Empirically, signals are about 6dB stronger going through the trees vertically polarized, than horizontal. The effect continues up to at least 2.4GHz. Above that, at 5.7GHz, the signals seem to be going through the holes between the leaves. I must admit that I haven't actually tried 45 degrees on 2m or 440Mhz, but I don't think it will help much. Still, it's an easy thing to try. You spent more words debunking the suggestion than admitting that you don't really know whether it could help or not. Good move. And, by the way, I have experience to the contrary at both 144 and 444 MHz. It all depends on the location of the source and the receiver. At 2 meters, some rotation of the antenna can sometimes be helpful. Note that we are not concerned with GHz. John |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 22 May 2011 20:56:52 -0500, John KD5YI
wrote: You may be right, Jeff. But he may not have 120ft redwoods around and, after all, this is a temporary fix until his yagi comes in. 30 years of trying to maintain a stable signal to several distant repeaters is sufficient to convince me. Trees move and grow, causing signals to change. Also, temporary is a rather useless term. In my experience, if it works, it's permanent. Good for you! Pat yourself on the back. Thank you for the traditional contentious remark. You spent more words debunking the suggestion than admitting that you don't really know whether it could help or not. True. I spent more words explaining why I suspect it will not work, what I expect will happen, and a bit of substantiation. I consider this a substantial improvement over the traditional one-line pontification. Good move. And, by the way, I have experience to the contrary at both 144 and 444 MHz. It all depends on the location of the source and the receiver. At 2 meters, some rotation of the antenna can sometimes be helpful. Perhaps it would be helpful if you read what I had written. I said that rotating the antenna might help temporarily, but that movements of the trees, tree growth, swaying branches in the wind, and possibly sources of reflections, will soon negate any temporary benefits. If the yagi is going to arrive shortly, then tilting the antenna is probably a useful exercise. Note that we are not concerned with GHz. Topic drift follows: Since you mentioned GHz, one of the other problems with living in the deep dark forest is that DBS satellite dish reception is a problem. I hacked an 8ft diameter hole in the tree canopy by lopping off some branches at about the 80ft level, through which I point my DirecTV dish. Every year, the trees grow a little, requiring that I move the dish around my roof. During the twice annual solar satellite outage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun_outage Twice a year, I photograph the sunlight shining through the hole and onto the dish and roof. If there are shadows of branches on the dish, I move it to a better location. http://www.11junk.com/jeffl/pics/DBS/ Note the shadow at 12 o'clock on the dish. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NVIS Dipoles Directional? | Antenna | |||
NVIS antenna question | Antenna | |||
40m full wave NVIS loop - mulitband use | Antenna | |||
Anyone using antennas for NVIS? | Antenna |