| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 5/31/2011 6:30 PM, Jim Lux wrote:
On 5/31/2011 4:12 PM, John S wrote: Are you feeding this with coax? Why not use a big choke at the feedpoint on the outside of the coax (i.e. a bunch of suitable ferrite toroids)? I don't understand. The built-in inherent balun needs no choke. But doesn't it need an extra length of coax on one of the sides? No. The left-hand side is #14 wire while the right-hand side is coax (obviously left and right can be reversed). A BNC female is at the bottom, bayonets downward, terminals upward. o / \ / \ / \ / \ + + \ / \ / \ / \ / oo The coax (right side) is connected as usual to the BNC and bent as shown. However, the coax's center conductor *only* is connected at the top to the #14 wire on the left of the diamond. The bottom end of the #14 wire is connected to the BNC connector shell at the bottom. The piece of coax on the right forms the balun. It is close to 1/4W internally considering the velocity factor of the coax, but about 1/2W externally. As I said, it isn't exact. It measures very well here. I measured VSWR of 1.02 but that was not the important part of all this. I have yet to measure current on the transmission line from the BNC to the source to my satisfaction. If I can supply clarifying info, let me know. 73, John |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The meaning of 'Radiation Resistance' | Antenna | |||
| Radiation Resistance | Antenna | |||
| Radiation Resistance & Efficiency | Antenna | |||
| Measuring radiation resistance | Homebrew | |||
| Measuring radiation resistance | Antenna | |||