Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/2/2011 1:27 PM, Michael wrote:
Just a quick update. I am seeing some gain with the Lazy H now that the feed line exiting the antenna has been moved to a 90 degree angle, but I don't think I am seeing the 5.9 dbd gain promised in the ARRL Antenna Handbook. I would guess it is more around 3 or 4 dbd gain with 1/2 wave length elements and 1/2 wave spacing between the top and bottom elements. It seems like alot of trouble to go to when an extended double zepp at the same height as top wire of the Lazy H might do just as well if not better. The plus is the Lazy H may have cleaner nulls off the sides which is helping with the occasional AM carriers that are coming out of Central and South America. Michael Just curious, how are you measuring this -2 to -3 dB difference you are referencing? tom K0TAR |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Lazy H does not seem to exhibit any gain over a dipole in thereal world | Antenna | |||
Why does the Lazy H antenna suck in the real world on 11 meters? | Antenna | |||
Whip on portable vs Dipole Gain for 2m or 70cm | Antenna | |||
WTB Mor-Gain or Antennas West PM Dipole | Swap | |||
highest gain hf antenna in the world | Antenna |