Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jun 8, 11:06*pm, Camelot wrote:
Hello, I have some doubts about standing waves on antennas that I hope you could clarify! As far as I understood, in a generic transmission line where we want only carry power from a source to a load, we need to cancel the reflected wave by adapting the load with the impedance of the line. The result of this operation is S11=S22=0 and VWWR=1 that means no standing waves. As far as I understood, in an antenna we want to also avoid standing waves by having *VWWR=1 in order to avoid overloading problem to the power stage... From theory I know that the best radiating condition for an antenna is when it resonates, that is, *when there is a standing wave… is that correct? How this condition is compatible with a *VWWR=1 (no standing waves) for a good antenna matching? Is there something that I’m not catching? Regards, Camelot I don't know that I'd say that "the best radiating condition for an antenna is when it resonates," necessarily. But certainly a resonant antenna is one that will have standing waves on it when it's excited. However, the standing waves on a resonant antenna result in radiation by the antenna, and the result of the standing waves, the radiation, and the resonance is that the feedpoint of the antenna looks like a resistance that absorbs power. The exact resistance depends on many things, but in general it's a resistance that either directly provides a good match to a transmission line, or else can be matched to a transmission line with a few components. By the way, it's also not necessary to have the antenna matched to the transmission line: although a particular line with standing waves delivering a certain amount of power to a load has more loss than the same line delivering power to a matched load (no standing waves), the additional loss from the standing waves may not be a big issue. In fact, it may be better from a lost-power standpoint to use a higher impedance open-wire line with relatively high standing waves, than to use a low impedance line (e.g., coax) with low standing waves, because the loss in the open-wire line can be very low. There are lots of other factors to consider, too, but the point is that you shouldn't assume that it's necessary to get the lowest possible SWR on the transmission line. Let's take one more step back from this problem. The antenna, whether resonant or not, presents some impedance at its feedpoint. The purpose of the transmission line is to couple power between a transmitter and the antenna feedpoint (or from the antenna feedpoint to a receiver). You don't need to know what's actually going on in the antenna, you only need to know that feedpoint impedance, to select the proper transmission line and possibly a matching network between the line and the antenna's feedpoint. (Well...you also need to be aware of how the metallic conductors of the transmission line may upset the fields around the antenna and possibly provide for decoupling the feedline from the antenna's fields, but that's separate from the issue of coupling power between the antenna and the transmitter/receiver.) Keep the details of how the antenna does its job--how the current is distributed on the antenna's conductors--separate from how you get power to and from the antenna, and you should be OK. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing waves | Antenna | |||
Poynting Vector in Standing Waves | Antenna | |||
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |