Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 jun, 08:06, Camelot wrote:
Hello, I have some doubts about standing waves on antennas that I hope you could clarify! As far as I understood, in a generic transmission line where we want only carry power from a source to a load, we need to cancel the reflected wave by adapting the load with the impedance of the line. The result of this operation is S11=S22=0 and VWWR=1 that means no standing waves. As far as I understood, in an antenna we want to also avoid standing waves by having *VWWR=1 in order to avoid overloading problem to the power stage... From theory I know that the best radiating condition for an antenna is when it resonates, that is, *when there is a standing wave… is that correct? How this condition is compatible with a *VWWR=1 (no standing waves) for a good antenna matching? Is there something that I’m not catching? Regards, Camelot Hello Camelot, Resonance in the antenna is not required for producing RF radiation. Horn shaped structures and flared transmission lines are good radiators over frequency ranges that can be over 1:5 (for example 1 GHz to 5 GHz). These wide band antennas rely on travelling waves in their conductors. When the wave goes from the feed point towards the end of the structure, it gradually attenuates because of the lost energy due to (desired) radiation. The distribution of the current in the antenna's conductors (amplitude and phase) determines the radiation pattern. Antennas made from thin wires show inconvenient impedance, except for some special lengths. The best-known example is the halve wave center- fed dipole. It gives a good match to coaxial transmission lines. Though it has a good match to a 50 Ohm line (so no standing waves in the transmission line), there are standing waves in the antenna. The sinusoidal voltage and current distribution in a half wave dipole is because of the large VSWR inside the antenna itself. So the halve wave dipole fed from a 50 Ohms line shows high SWR in the antenna, but low SWR in the feed line. The full wave dipole is also in resonance (two end-fed halve wave antennas), but its impedance is in the several hundreds Ohms to kOhms range (depending in wire thickness). It has somewhat more directivity then the half wave dipole, but gives large mismatch to coaxial transmission lines. If you drive the full wave dipole directly from a coaxial line (and do the matching in the shack), you will very likely lose most of your transmitting power (in the form of heat in the coaxial feed line). The full-wave dipole can be fed from an open wire transmission line (ladder line) directly. There will be mismatch at the antenna-feeder transition, but it will be less (ladder line has high char. Impedance). As Tim said, the loss (or attenuation) of the ladder line is significantly below that of coaxial transmission lines, so even high VSWR inside the transmission line will not lead to significant line loss. Short antennas (length 0.1 lambda) are good radiators, but their impedance can be so weird that it is impossible to match them to a convenient impedance without excessive loss. The losses are in the matching networks, not in the radiating structure itself. So generally spoken, resonance (that is ohmic antenna behavior) is not required for an antenna to radiate. Regarding transmission lines. Zload = Zcable, is not required for long lines, but gives the lowest loss. Depending on your requirements, you may accept some mismatch between load and line (so standing waves in the line and somewhat increased line loss). Ladder line (parallel wire transmission line) can be used with significant SWR inside the line with relative low loss. The same SWR in a coaxial transmission line with same length may result in too much loss. Transmission sections are used in matching networks. Well-known example: quarter wave transformer. It does function because of a standing wave part inside the quarter wave line. Regarding the PA. The PA just wants to see a certain load impedance to operate properly. With "properly" I mean delivering the stated power without too much stress on the PA's components. With kind regards, Wim PA3DJS www.tetech.nl Please tell your racing pigeon to remove abc in case of PM. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Standing waves | Antenna | |||
Poynting Vector in Standing Waves | Antenna | |||
Standing morphing to travelling waves, and other stupid notions | Antenna | |||
Standing Waves (and Impedance) | Antenna | |||
Imaginary Standing Waves? | Antenna |