Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "The other John Smith" wrote in message link.net... I now have an HP 8405A Vector Voltmeter. I also have a Narda dual directional coupler. It's been a long time since I've used a VVM. I see 'em in the "send to scrap" piles around here. Richard points out much more than I could and certainly has a more jaundiced eye than I, but this one thing cought my eye The HP voltmeter is able to zero out the phase angle between channels A and B. So, I'll put a 50 Ohm dummy load out there for the Load and set the phase angle offset to zero. I forget how it offsets the phase reading, but I'd start by making the cable lengths so that the two measurement points are "at the same pointy along the line". (of course I have a line stretcher to make it easier) It sure seems to me that the Zero angle 50 ohm load must be a bad assumption. The 50 could be anywhere angle-wise and is the hardest to measure since the reflected is so small...Wouldn't it be "better" to use a short (of course I'm looking at a couple of Narda shorts at my operating position every night) for a primary 180 degree reference (the open being "harder" to obtain)? I think you mentioned using several other loads as well (parallel 50s=25, etc). I would use several different loads like this to "measure" to see how the measurements look compared to expected (cal-kit style). I'd measure opens, shorts and several other mismatches to make sure all available "knows" looks close, then proceed. I'd also pad the Tx output. Long lengths of miniature coax in lew of actual power attenuators. OOPS! gotta re-boot, 73 -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
SWR will change with Source Z if you measure AT the Source | Antenna |