Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 6/29/2011 11:04 AM, Cecil Moore wrote:
On Jun 25, 5:25 pm, John wrote: But, it does. First, it causes the 50 ohms line (looking into the 291.4 ohms line to see a match due to the reflection. Second, the re-reflection from that discontinuity is half of what maintains the circulating energy on the line. The other half is the discontinuity of the non-virtual load. You are confusing reflection with wave cancellation (destructive interference). I suggest that you study the separate sections on reflections vs interference in "Optics", by Hecht. Nowhere does any optical textbook indicate that superposition and reflection are the same thing (and they are indeed NOT the same thing). You always fall back on the optics thing, don't you? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Derivation of Reflection Coefficient vs SWR | Antenna | |||
Convert reflection coefficient to Z | Antenna | |||
Reflection Coefficient | Antenna | |||
Uses of Reflection Coefficient Bridges. | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna |