Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's not clear to me what noise you're trying to measure. If you're
trying to measure the thermal noise of a good resistor, you're SOL -- anything you try to measure it with will add its own noise, which you'll end up measuring instead. You can easily calculate the thermal noise, though. If you're trying to measure the internal noise of the spectrum analyzer, the answer is on the screen and, as you've found, it's a function of the filter bandwidth. If you're trying to measure the noise coming from a receiver, it has to be considerably greater than the SA's internal noise, or you'll never see it. That means you'll have to amplify it until you can see it, with an amplifier that's quiet enough that the noise it adds isn't significant. The noise figure of the SA itself is typically much worse than a decent receiver -- it's been traded for dynamic range. Once you get whatever noise you're trying to measure up to the level you can see it on the SA, you'll find that its magnitude also varies with the SA filter bandwidth, if the noise is broadband. You can get any S/N ratio you want, if you can tolerate an arbitrarily narrow bandwidth. A real receiver has some particular bandwidth to accommodate the incoming signal. It's usually this bandwidth at which the S/N ratio is measured. Roy Lewallen, W7EL Bill B. wrote: Hello, I need some help in figuring out how to properly use a Spec. Analyzer. I have done several hours of research online now, and have somewhat of an idea of what I am doing, but I just can't get down one piece of the puzzle. In my line of work, we use simple devices that give us the noise floor level in dB. I (stupidly) expected to be able to get this same information easily out of a SA. As you may have guessed by now, I ran into a problem when switching the RBW value. After much... much reading, I fully understand *WHY* it changes (Filters increasing in size cause a greater internal noise level, etc.) but I can't figure the best way to get a "base" noise level reading. And as much as I would like to fully understand the theory, what I really need is a few more examples... IE: If you are looking a 100 MHz span and your RBW is 1MHz simply ___Fill in the Blank____ to find the base noise floor. To further explain what I am trying to do, we are setting up a link that requires a SNR of at least 6dB... I need to get the noise floor level to compare with my projected signal strength for this link. Please be nice... This is my first post grin Thank you! Thank you! Bill B. - N1SNI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roy Lewallen" wrote in message ... [...snip...] If you're trying to measure the noise coming from a receiver, it has to be considerably greater than the SA's internal noise, or you'll never see it. Assuming classical "noise" as we are all probably thinking... First, a minor correction to the above "considerably greater", Roy. If the EXternal noise is just 6dB above the SA's INternal noise (I guess 4 times can be considered 'considerable'), then the resulting displayed value will be only 1 dB higher than the incomming noise actually is. Noise power (when combining in one receiver) simply adds. To see the math, think this way. A 1 dB increase amounts to 1.25 times the power. That extra 25 percent is one fourth the original power. 25% of the power is 6dB down from the original. SO adding some power which is -6 dB (or 25% the original) will raise the total 1 dB. However, The poster used the term "noise", but doesn't know the source of his problem. His data hits can be caused by other than what we are thinking is noise. It can be (sounds like since it recently started) spurious signals in his channel OR it could be IM being caused from strong signals getting into his receiver. The spurious in-band stuff could be narrow signals or wideband. Typical CDMA signals behave much like simple wide-band noise as we think of noise. A narrow band signal/spur is different. From a later post I see that he is trying to measure some junk that has appeared on the link frequency causing interference. In any case, the front-end noise floor (noise figure) of the SA will determine how far down you will be able to see and if it is not low enough, then you won't see the interference. I can not comment on the Advantest sensitivity. If you have access to a low noise amplifier of the type used in your system, it can be used in front of the SA and *MAY* raise the sensitivity (lower the noise figure/floor) enough to see yout interference. Good luck. We've had a strange low level (around -123 dBm)spur on our repeater input since last fall and can't locate it...wish I had lotsa time. -- Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Antenna radiated spurs | Antenna | |||
FS: MOTOROLA VHF SPECTRUM ANTENNA | Antenna | |||
FS: VHF Motorola Spectrum mobile antenna in MA | Antenna |