Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard,
Are you sure you meant the statements quoted below? Horizontal polarization bounces just fine from "horizontally conducting surfaces". Indeed, when a mixed polarization wave hits a conducting surface the horizontal polarization in the reflected wave is enhanced, not "short-circuited". This is the same phenomenon that is the related to Brewster's angle. Perhaps you really meant to say that a special guided wave mode, namely the ground wave, does not support horizontal polarization. 73, Gene W4SZ Richard Clark wrote: [Lots of more or less correct stuff snipped] Well, this is where you are in over your head (water metaphors are abundant in this topic). This, again, requires presumptions insofar as the original observation was driven by the AM example. However, at this point we will depart from the low frequency mandate to examine another mandate: polarization and your presumption of conductivity. A horizontally polarized antenna seeing a horizontally conducting surface is a scenario that describes a self-short-circuit. Horizontally polarized waves meeting the earth (a conductive one) immediately snuff themselves (how long would your car battery last with a screwdriver held across its poles?). On the other hand, vertical antennas do not suffer this fate - and for the same reason: it is a current wave (or at least the magnetic component inducing such a current, in a conductive earth) that spans earth making a perfectly reasonable relationship to continued propagation. [More snip] |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Salt Water Ground Plane | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |