Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 23:13:25 +0000 (UTC), Owen Duffy
wrote: You are treading down a well worn path. Yeah, I know the feeling when I'm stuck in a rut. There is a flaw in thinking that the shield of the coax below the bottom of your nominal dipole does not carry significant current on the outer surface. Whilst you are trying to account for the current distribution on the nominal dipole, you are ignoring the common mode current on the feedline. Agreed. The feedline should be decoupled, which one can do by wrapping a few turns into a coil and tied together with tie wraps. Another method is a 1/4 wave decoupling sleeve further down the coax cable. The antenna will 'work' and you may be delightedm but if you expect that it will have very low VSWR based on formula dimensions, I think you will be dissapointed. Well, putting a 75 ohm antenna onto a 50 ohm system results in a minimum VSWR of 1.5:1 assuming the coax is cut for some multiple of 1/2 wave electrical length. Also, most HT's are designed to tolerate the fairly miserable VSWR presented by rubber ducky antennas and body proximity. In this case, the problem to be solved was rather mundane. A friend was in the process of packing for a weekend camping trip with the kids. His 13 year old daughter apparently had lost the rubber ducky antenna from her Yaesu FT-60r. Rather than borrow an antenna, or build an adapter kludge, he decides it's time for her to build an antenna. They found some SMA cables, and proceeded to make a simple coaxial sleeve dipole. However, there was some debate over the cut length of the driven element because of the presence of coax dielectric. I get a hasty email with the question and discover that I really don't know the answer. So, I posted the question here. We'll find out how it worked when they return. Whether the home made antenna is optimized for best performance doesn't seem to be important in this case. Any reasonable antenna is better than a rubber ducky, so she should be fine (assuming she doesn't lose another antenna). You might obtain better feedline decoupling by some form of common mode choke. Yes, that will help (as previously noted). The failure of the sleeve to effectively decouple the dipole is the reason why several antennas don't work as thought. King gives some hints that the relative diameters of the conductors bears on operation. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Building a Ready-Made "GreerTech" Coax Cable [Shielded] Loop Antenna with Multi-Heads | Shortwave | |||
Cutting cable length to match 1/4 wave 162 MHz antenna? | Antenna | |||
TX to Antenna cable length? | Antenna | |||
FS:RG8X 18 FT LENGTH COAX WITH COAX CONNECTOR | Swap | |||
TV antenna question-cable length | Antenna |