Remember Me?
Menu
Home
Search
Today's Posts
Home
Search
Today's Posts
RadioBanter
»
rec.radio.amateur
»
Antenna
>
Automatic antenna tuners
LinkBack
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Display Modes
Prev
Next
#
2
July 31st 11, 09:56 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
Owen Duffy
external usenet poster
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,169
Automatic antenna tuners
ehoops wrote in news:2bb452d8-e127-42a6-bbb0-
:
....
Does anyone know what I should get? I'd really just like to turn on
the radio, move to a frequency, turn on the ATT, and tap away. Help!
Firstly, is an ATU really necessary with your antenna. One of the
selling points of these kind of antennas is that they are a fair match
to 50 ohm line... though an ATU might overcome to some extent the narrow
bandwidth on the lowest bands.
Next, there are a range of generic automatic ATUs, they fall broadly
into those intended to go into a coaxial line and those intended to feed
unbalanced loads like end fed wires, monopoles etc. The each have
different matching ranges and applications.
Some of these generic auto ATUs can be interfaced to proprietary ATU
interfaces on transceivers. Some transceiver support for ATUs is quite
poor and might be construed as a marketing ploy, eg most Icom
transceivers seem to abort a tune process after about 18s, so they do
not integrate well with an ATU that might take 30s to find a match.
This lack of open interface, and flexible support is a problem. I
attempted to design a protocol converter to properly integrate an SGC237
with an Icom radio, but I abandoned it because the SGC cannot be
guaranteed to complete within 18s, and if it has to restart, it restarts
from scratch and the same problem occurs. On the other hand, I was able
to make a reliable protocol converter for a 'screwdriver' type ATU, as
in the rare circumstance that the tune had not completed when the Icom
aborted, the coil contact was closer to the desired point and in tests,
always completed on the next attempt.
So, in my experience, Icoms work reliably with Icom ATUs, but have
issues with some non-proprietary ATUs. This is why I say that ATU
support is used as a marketing ploy.
Owen
Reply With Quote
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Show Printable Version
Search this Thread
:
Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode
Switch to Hybrid Mode
Threaded Mode
Posting Rules
Smilies
are
On
[IMG]
code is
On
HTML code is
Off
Trackbacks
are
On
Pingbacks
are
On
Refbacks
are
On
Similar Threads
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Why Antenna Tuners Aren't Necessarily Useful for Shortwave Listening - Question Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna Tuners - Do You Have An Opinion ?
Bob Miller
Shortwave
40
September 3rd 12
02:15 PM
Three Uses for the MFJ-956 Shortwave Antenna Pre-Selector / Tuner - Applies to most Pre-Selectors and Antenna Tuners
RHF
Shortwave
0
April 9th 06
10:16 PM
Why Antenna Tuners Aren't Necessarily Useful for Shortwave Listening - Question Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna Tuners - Do You Have An Opinion ?
Slow Code
Shortwave
5
March 9th 06
11:51 PM
Automatic vs. Manual Tuners
Dee Flint
Antenna
3
February 16th 05
12:27 AM
MFJ vs SGC automatic antenna tuners??
Spam
Antenna
2
January 19th 05
05:27 AM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is
11:09 PM
.
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
Contact Us
RadioBanter forum home
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2017
LinkBack
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks