Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I was wondering, aside from the obvious , what the trade-offs might be
between a moderately priced manual tuner (example: Palstar AT1KM) and a auto tuner such as the LDG AT-100 Pro or the soon to be released AT-200 Pro I guess it is obvious that you have more control with the manual tuner and are more likely to achieve a match with minimal inductance..(or losses) Not famliar enough with these auto tuners to know if that try to replicate a low-loss match that you can genarally achieve with a manual tuner or not..... Would appreciate any helpful comments |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
MFJ vs SGC automatic antenna tuners?? | Antenna | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Boatanchors | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Equipment | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Equipment | |||
FS: NOS Heathkit Manuals | Swap |