Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old June 9th 04, 05:21 PM
Fractenna
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Maybe this is a naive question, but how does an antenna, fractal or
otherwise, know what kind of transmitter is driving it? Why are
software radios more suited to this design?

vy 73

Andy, M1EBV


True frequency and waveform agility is the goal in SDR . Wideband, or
controlled multiband, is needed. Ham requirements are well met at present with
a variety of antenna designs that are nearly periodic in a fairly narrow
frequency coverage, a fairly easy problem to solve.
73,
Chip N1iR
  #22   Report Post  
Old June 13th 04, 02:45 AM
CW
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Translation: fractured antennas are horse****.

"Fractenna" wrote in message
news:20040609122135.15248.00000404@mb-
True frequency and waveform agility is the goal in SDR . Wideband, or
controlled multiband, is needed. Ham requirements are well met at present

with
a variety of antenna designs that are nearly periodic in a fairly narrow
frequency coverage, a fairly easy problem to solve.
73,
Chip N1iR



  #23   Report Post  
Old June 13th 04, 02:50 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW"
wrote:
Translation: fractured antennas are horse****.

Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-)
  #24   Report Post  
Old June 13th 04, 05:50 AM
CW
 
Posts: n/a
Default

LOL!

"Richard Clark" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW"
wrote:
Translation: fractured antennas are horse****.

Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-)



  #25   Report Post  
Old June 13th 04, 12:27 PM
Ian Jackson
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In message , Richard Clark
writes
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW"
wrote:
Translation: fractured antennas are horse****.

Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-)


Not a good analogy. Horse**** can be quite useful (ask any organic
gardener).
Ian.
--



  #26   Report Post  
Old June 13th 04, 04:02 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ian Jackson wrote:

In message , Richard Clark
writes

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW"
wrote:

Translation: fractured antennas are horse****.


Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-)



Not a good analogy. Horse**** can be quite useful (ask any organic
gardener).
Ian.


Equine Excrement is a tad difficult for some gardening. IT has lots of
plant material that needs a good bit of time to compost correctly.
Mushroom growers love it, tho'.

- Mike KB3EIA -

  #27   Report Post  
Old June 13th 04, 06:34 PM
Tdonaly
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ian wrote,

In message , Richard Clark
writes
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 18:45:30 -0700, "CW"
wrote:
Translation: fractured antennas are horse****.

Unfortunately, that association is an aspersion upon horse****. ;-)


Not a good analogy. Horse**** can be quite useful (ask any organic
gardener).
Ian.
--


Right. It's absolutely indispensable to cowboys and politicians.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


  #28   Report Post  
Old June 24th 04, 03:27 PM
k4wge
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A consortium to investigate fractal electrodynamics theory (FET) has a
webpage at this URL.

http://www.tsc.upc.es/fractalcoms/

From the site:

"There is [a] potential limitation of fractal microwave devices that
must be investigated: the loss efficiency. It has been shown that in
fractal geometries electromagnetic fields and currents concentrate
into very small regions. Since the power loss due to Joule effect is
proportional to the square of the electric current density integrated
along the device surface, current concentration in small areas produce
much larger power losses than more uniform current distributions. This
effect may result in antennas having much lower gain... "

The articles and links are very interesting.
  #29   Report Post  
Old June 24th 04, 03:27 PM
k4wge
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A consortium to investigate fractal electrodynamics theory (FET) has a
webpage at this URL.

http://www.tsc.upc.es/fractalcoms/

From the site:

"There is [a] potential limitation of fractal microwave devices that
must be investigated: the loss efficiency. It has been shown that in
fractal geometries electromagnetic fields and currents concentrate
into very small regions. Since the power loss due to Joule effect is
proportional to the square of the electric current density integrated
along the device surface, current concentration in small areas produce
much larger power losses than more uniform current distributions. This
effect may result in antennas having much lower gain... "

The articles and links are very interesting.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
current/inductance discusion Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 54 January 4th 04 07:08 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? totojepast Antenna 16 September 21st 03 07:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017