Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 11th 04, 11:04 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Tue, 11 May 2004 11:59:10 +0200, Jan Van Belle
wrote:

Hello all,

The last days I was searching for more info o how to build fratal
antennas on the web. But besides lots of links to fractenna.com and a few
powerpoint slides I found nothing.

Has anyone sucessfully build such an antenna for HF? Is anyone using it?

Kind regards,

Jan, ON5DOA


Hi Jan,

The reason you see such a void of examples is because of your very
question:
who has built one?

This question above is the one that follows:
which one to build?

And this question above is the one that follows:
what limitations do I have?
or:
what qualities do I want?

Your question is raised here on sporadic occasions, and the poster
NEVER returns to report a successful outcome. This is not due to lack
of information. For such (the largest compilation in the world)
visit:
http://www.qsl.net/kb7qhc/antenna/fractal/index.htm

You should immediately notice that the first impediment is found in
the very nature of fractal shapes.

Do you want gain? Seems not, you do not describe having a large
enough space to do that.

Do you want multi banded resonances in a small space? Probably, but
you will find very, very few examples worth the effort (frankly none).
In all likelihood you would need a tuner, and if you had a tuner, you
should skip the complication of this academic trash.

In open competition between an Amateur and the professional fractal
builder, the professional lost against 6 designs that trounced the
best professional fractal on the basis of gain for the smallest
footprint. That is to say, all seven antennas were bound within a
prescribed "small" area (such as you describe), and the fractal came
in dead last.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 17th 04, 08:03 AM
Jan Van Belle
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Richard Clark wrote:
In open competition between an Amateur and the professional fractal
builder, the professional lost against 6 designs that trounced the
best professional fractal on the basis of gain for the smallest
footprint. That is to say, all seven antennas were bound within a
prescribed "small" area (such as you describe), and the fractal came
in dead last.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Sorry,

I've had a little accident while sporting and since I've only
a quick connection at the QRL, I couldn't check my mail and this newsgroup.

OK, thanx for the explanation. It seems I can leave it now! I thought it
would be a nice solution: a big amount of wire on a small area. But if
performance is even lower as other antennas and I can only come out on QRP
(I've got an FT-817) it is probably not the thing to choose for in first
instance.

Thanks all for the replies, links, etc. !!

73's de Jan, ON5DOA
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
current/inductance discusion Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 54 January 4th 04 07:08 PM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 03:01 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 07:44 PM
Are fractal antennas being used in cellphones? totojepast Antenna 16 September 21st 03 07:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017