Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:19:29 -0700, Jim Lux
wrote: Not so much full duplex, but single frequency half duplex, with negligible time delay (implying 100ms frame time) between Rx and Tx. Most of the delay will not come from the flight time or mux switching. It will come from the necessary audio compression. It won't work without audio compression, which means that some types of uncompressible pre-randomized data is not going to work (no big deal). Also, the more compression, the longer the latency. TDMA cellphone uses split bands probably because it was on top of existing AMPS systems. Yep. The problem was that TDMA (IS-54/IS-136) had to be compatible with the then existing analog cell systems. Therefore, all early TDMA phones had to offer analog compatibility. Digital only phones weren't available until about 2003. There's also little justification for making the change. It will not double the number of available channels as some pundits have suggested. Since the return audio now has to be sqeezed into the previously transmit only channel, the number of users per channel is cut in half. The result is no capacity change. There is also a frequency allocation issue (e.g. no need for new licensing). Having separate forward and reverse bands also helps with frequency reuse and near-far issues. I hardly think that hams are going to carpet the country with repeaters to the extent that cell sites do. I've looked into butchering cellular handsets into something usable on ham radio. I have internals on some of the old Motorola flip phones and bag phones and could probably modify the firmware sufficiently to turn it into a conventional radios. The fatal flaw was the fixed 45MHz T/R offset. There were simply too many components that would need to be replaced in order to operate on the smaller offset available to hams, or on simplex. In addition, it's usually fairly easy to go down in frequency, but the phones would require going up from the 850MHz cellular bands to the 915MHz ham band. I gave up on the idea. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BREAKING NEWS FROM ARNEWSLINE: FCC RULES THAT DIGITAL VOICE REPEATERS ARE REPEATERS | Info | |||
New Duplexers | Swap | |||
Duplexers | Equipment | |||
wtb: 900 Mhz duplexers | Swap | |||
wtb: 2m duplexers | Swap |