Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Losses in shunt-fed towers
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 21:10:08 +0200, "Antonio Vernucci"
wrote: For 75 and 80 meters, I use a shunt-fed tower (58 feet high, with a fairly big HF yagi on its top). The home-made tuner, placed at the tower base, has a motorized variable vacuum capacitor in series and a (properly selected) fixed capacitor in parallel. I can so remotely tune the variable capacitor across the 3500 - 3800 kHz range obtaining a perfect match to 50-ohm everywhere in the band. Hi Antonio, Describe the "shunt." (I presume it is a long wire from the tuner, standing off 10cm or so, up maybe 5 - 10 meters where it attaches to the tower? Can I also presume that the tower goes to ground at the base?) The antenna works fine and I receive good reports. And so it would seem this would be the end of the post. But no..... The only thing which worries me a bit is the very high voltage that develops at the antenna end End? There are at least two, and perhaps you mean the end of the shunt at the tuner? If by "end" you mean up at the very top, then high voltage would be expected (but worry about it would not be expected). By this point, there are a lot of gaps in the description (at least for me). (about 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz with 2kW applied, growing to about 8,600 Vrms at 3.800 MHz). I am not sure whether such high voltage could be a source of significant losses. You worry about loss, when you receive good reports? High voltage reveals loss in heat. Corona would be an example, but you don't describe corona. You also don't describe heat. To solve my doubt, I started by precisely measuring the capacitance of the tuner capacitors, and I could then easily calculate the antenna impedance at 3.500 MHz, which resulted to be (18.2 + j 656) ohm. I think you have a sign problem. You are describing a short antenna with inductive reactance (given the height and wavelength, very improbable). However, this might be the feedpoint impedance at the lower end of the shunt - maybe, maybe not. ABOUT CURRENT With 2 kW applied, one can easily determine that the RF current flowing through the antenna is about 10.5A, quite higher than the 6.3A figure one would get should the antenna resistance be 50 ohm instead of 18.2 ohm. So, I must expect some more loss in the conductors due to the fairly high current. Only in the shunt wire. Only if you are using wirewrap wire. Measure the RESISTANCE. Multiply by CURRENT squared. You get WATTs. How many? That is your loss. Now, if you can measure the resistance of your tower, stand very far back because it is about to fall over from being rusted out. ABOUT VOLTAGE The 10.5 A current flowing through the big 656 ohm antenna reactance causes the antenna RF voltage to get up to 6,900 Vrms at 3.500 MHz. Touching the wire with a (well insulated) screwdriver, you would see a nice Tesla-like arc. With this statement, it is obvious that you are not touching the screwdriver to the "end" of the antenna (some 15-20 meters above your head). Current and voltage are not uniformly equal along the length of the antenna. Your beam at the top acting as a top hat might yield some uniformity, but that doesn't come from simple math analysis. Instead, what you describe is a feedpoint impedance calculation. Any idea on whether the high RF voltage present on the antenna could cause some significant loss? You are working very hard to find a problem that isn't there. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
you hoas could face a huge lawsut for requiring cellphone towers andother towers to bllend in with the sky | Scanner | |||
Window ladder line losses ton environment vs coax losses | Antenna | |||
shunt fed AM Sticks | Broadcasting | |||
shunt feeding towers | Antenna | |||
Is Universal Towers (auminum towers) Still in Business ? | Antenna |