Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roy Lewallen wrote in message ...
With a typical ground plane antenna, the feedline can radiate significantly, distorting the pattern. This effect could easily be different for the different antennas. Modeling indicates that two baluns are often needed to suppress the current on the outside of the feedline. A model which includes the feedline might give some insights as to why the antennas behave so differently. Roy Lewallen, W7EL It's quite possible. The 1/2 was the only one I actually added a decoupling section to. It was a 1/4 wave length of coax below the feed, and a grounded set of 1/4 wave radials at the base of that section. About the same scheme as cushcraft uses on their ringo ranger 2 verticals. It did improve the antenna. I never added extra decoupling to the 1/4 or 5/8 antennas. But I did try both 1/4 and 3/4 wave radials on the 5/8 antenna. Ended up prefering the 3/4 radials..The 1/2 wave was a very good antenna, but in my case, not once did it ever beat the 5/8. Actually, thinking about it, and even included many CB antenna setups going back years and years, I've never seen a 5/8 GP that didn't handily beat a 1/4 GP by 2 S units to a local ground wave station. Even using the 1/4 wave radials, which I'm not crazy about for a 5/8 antenna. These were all using various length feedlines I'm sure. MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Plans for a 5/8 wave 2M ground plane | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |