"tom" napisal w wiadomosci
. net...
On 11/8/2011 2:10 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Uzytkownik napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan wrote:
Probably in this paper is also the answer for my question: "And what
about
the 365 days period (annual effect)?

Unfortunately I am not an expert in radio. Do you know the answer?
S*

Why are you so obsessed by this question?

Once mo
""In 1818 Arago found that the refraction of a prism for star light was
the
same for light incident in the direction of the earth's orbital velocity
v
as for that coming in the opposite direction. This unexpected null result
was explained that same year by Fresnel's ether-dray theory, which
assumed
partial ether entrainment in transparent media by an amount depending
upon
the first power of v." From: http://www.3rd1000.com/chronoatoms.htm

Today's spectrograph astronomers assume that the effect is not null.

It seems to me that today's astronomers are wrong because in physics are
still null result.
So I am looking for the result from communication with the spacecraft.
S*

Like I said. He doesn't like new results. Ever.

I am looking for the new result.

Astronomers ASSUME. I do not know why.

And if you provide evidence that he doesn't like, such as spacecraft comm
results that will likely not be what he likes, he will dispute it and
point back to the deprecated experiments.

In today's physics is opinion that we can detect the angular motion (Sagnac
effect) but it is impossible to detect the linear motion.
Who and when deprecated the famous null result?
S*