Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 6th 03, 07:53 AM
OK1SIP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Reg Edwards" wrote in message ...
... There is NO antenna which will allow high radiating efficiency on all
bands without a tuner. ...


Hi Reg,
the antenna at http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm should cover all
bands except the topband without a device called "a tuner". Of course
it has a tuner of its sort - a set of switchable pieces of twinlead.

73 de Ivan OK1SIP
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 6th 03, 11:07 AM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"OK1SIP" wrote
"Reg Edwards" wrote
There is NO antenna which will allow high radiating efficiency on all
bands without a tuner. ...


Hi Reg,
the antenna at http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm should cover all
bands except the topband without a device called "a tuner". Of course
it has a tuner of its sort - a set of switchable pieces of twinlead.


Hello Ivan,

I am familiar with Cecil's binary-switched variable-length feedline. We are
friends and I hope to keep things that way. ;o)

In terms of expectations, quite correctly you say "*should* cover all bands"
rather than "*will* cover all bands". Actually it doesn't cover (tune) any
band.

As a fundamental principle every tuner must have at least two variable
components because it has to match Z = R+jX which also contains two
variables. In more practical terms a tuner must have at least two knobs, for
example, one to vary L and another to vary C.

So it is impossible (or at least extrememly inconvenient) for a transmission
line to behave as a tuner because only its length can be changed. Unless, of
course, Cecil can invent a way of varying its impedance Zo between, say, 100
and 600 ohms.

But bearing in mind Cecil's primary objective in using a 'tuner' is to
provide a load which will keep the transmitter happy, without regard to SWR
on the variable-length feedline, his arrangement is successful. It is
necessary only for the transmitter to be happy provided its load indicator
has a reading which does not exceed much above 1.5 to 1. (SWR).

Whether or not the station operator is happy using a tuner with one of the
knobs missing is another matter.

The behaviour/performance of Cecil's 'tuner' can be very accurately modelled
using program DIPOLE3. Download in a few seconds from website below. Just
vary frequency or line length and watch the line input impedance.
----
=======================
Regards from Reg, G4FGQ
For Free Radio Design Software
go to http://www.g4fgq.com
=======================







  #3   Report Post  
Old August 6th 03, 03:09 PM
W5DXP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
But bearing in mind Cecil's primary objective in using a 'tuner' is to
provide a load which will keep the transmitter happy, without regard to SWR
on the variable-length feedline, ...


Since I developed this antenna, I have upgraded from an IC-706
to an IC-756PRO which has a built-in autotuner which will match most anything
with a 50 ohm SWR of 3:1 or less. So my variable length feedline is ideal for
hams with built-in autotuners who are having trouble matching high SWR's.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017