Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message ...
... There is NO antenna which will allow high radiating efficiency on all bands without a tuner. ... Hi Reg, the antenna at http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm should cover all bands except the topband without a device called "a tuner". Of course it has a tuner of its sort - a set of switchable pieces of twinlead. 73 de Ivan OK1SIP |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"OK1SIP" wrote
"Reg Edwards" wrote There is NO antenna which will allow high radiating efficiency on all bands without a tuner. ... Hi Reg, the antenna at http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp/notuner.htm should cover all bands except the topband without a device called "a tuner". Of course it has a tuner of its sort - a set of switchable pieces of twinlead. Hello Ivan, I am familiar with Cecil's binary-switched variable-length feedline. We are friends and I hope to keep things that way. ;o) In terms of expectations, quite correctly you say "*should* cover all bands" rather than "*will* cover all bands". Actually it doesn't cover (tune) any band. As a fundamental principle every tuner must have at least two variable components because it has to match Z = R+jX which also contains two variables. In more practical terms a tuner must have at least two knobs, for example, one to vary L and another to vary C. So it is impossible (or at least extrememly inconvenient) for a transmission line to behave as a tuner because only its length can be changed. Unless, of course, Cecil can invent a way of varying its impedance Zo between, say, 100 and 600 ohms. But bearing in mind Cecil's primary objective in using a 'tuner' is to provide a load which will keep the transmitter happy, without regard to SWR on the variable-length feedline, his arrangement is successful. It is necessary only for the transmitter to be happy provided its load indicator has a reading which does not exceed much above 1.5 to 1. (SWR). Whether or not the station operator is happy using a tuner with one of the knobs missing is another matter. The behaviour/performance of Cecil's 'tuner' can be very accurately modelled using program DIPOLE3. Download in a few seconds from website below. Just vary frequency or line length and watch the line input impedance. ---- ======================= Regards from Reg, G4FGQ For Free Radio Design Software go to http://www.g4fgq.com ======================= |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg Edwards wrote:
But bearing in mind Cecil's primary objective in using a 'tuner' is to provide a load which will keep the transmitter happy, without regard to SWR on the variable-length feedline, ... Since I developed this antenna, I have upgraded from an IC-706 to an IC-756PRO which has a built-in autotuner which will match most anything with a 50 ohm SWR of 3:1 or less. So my variable length feedline is ideal for hams with built-in autotuners who are having trouble matching high SWR's. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|