Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "rhymer" wrote in message ... What is the best way to use one feed line for more than one dipole? Or, is it better to use a coax switch in the shack? Thanks, Ron Ron, Connecting two *dipoles* to the same feedline works just fine. Just tie them directly to the same balun. There will be two kinds of interaction: first, the two are electrically in parallel, and second, the wires themselves could have mutual coupling. The first seems to not really be a problem, and the second is minimized if there is separation between the two dipoles. For best results, put them at right angles to each other; if that is not possible, have at least 15 - 30 degrees separation, either vertical or horizontal. For instance, you could have a dipole supported at the ends, with an inverted V hanging below it. The most interesting case is for antennas at 75 and 80 meters. You get 2:1 SWR from 3.5 to 4 MHz in a virtually non directional antenna (if the two dipoles are at 90 degrees). I presently have a 40 m inverted V hanging below an 17 m dipole. (The trees are too close to do it the other way). The 40 meter is also out of plane to miss the trees. Works great. Since you have to trim the lengths slightly (lowest frequency first), it is simplest to run EZNEC or some other simulation first. Tam/WB2TT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coax choke, losses and ferrite | Antenna | |||
Coax length - important ? | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Ladder Line or Coax For Reception only? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |