Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dave wrote:
That is because "forward and reflected power waves" is a derivative concept. It depends on concepts of voltage and current waves for its existence; but it doesn't add anything useful that we didn't already know. i know that, i was just trying to get in all the bogus arguments before anyone else did. Oh... in that case: "Well done - a noble effort, sir!" (You forgot to mention the slotted line, which mercifully saved you from a perfect score :-) 'power waves' are a concept invented to simplify some concepts, but instead they just hide the important details. we have been over and over that on here in the past and always end up in the same place, i was just hoping to skip right to the end. What, in this newsgroup? maybe if i had learned to use smileys it would have helped.... what is the sarcastic one?? something like ;-^ or something like that?? Sorry I missed the deliberate irony on your part, Dave, but the same things have often been said here in total seriousness. And here we go again... -- 73 from Ian G3SEK 'In Practice' columnist for RadCom (RSGB) http://www.ifwtech.co.uk/g3sek |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |