Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave wrote:
Cecil wrote: Uhhhh Dave, the original topic is the Subject: line. If anything, what happens inside a transmitter is the irrelevant subject since appreciable reflections hardly ever reach the typical ham transmitter. here is the original: Are you saying that the original subject was wrong? of course it is contrived. no one uses loads of those exact impedances, or lengths of coax like you do. Dave, have you ever heard of an example? What I posted is one easy-to-understand example of virtually an infinite number of possible examples of a Z0-match. If you like, here is another example of a Z0-match: XMTR------tuner---unknown length of feedline---unknown load 100W-- --0W There is a Z0-match at the input of the tuner. All the voltages and all the currents are very close to in-phase or 180 degrees out of phase at the input of the tuner. Do you have the balls to assert that the above configuration is "contrived"? THE GREAT MAJORITY OF AMATEUR RADIO ANTENNA SYSTEMS ACHIEVE CLOSE TO A Z0-MATCH!!! That means all the voltages and currents are close to being in phase or 180 degrees out of phase. I'm sorry that technical fact hairlips you. Since your hidden agenda is hidden, I can only guess what it might be. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |