"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:
of course it is against guidelines. you were starting a new thread
without
changing the subject. in effect hijacking the thread for your own
discussion.

Of course, it is not against the guidelines as the subject was "Reflected
Power". I simply continued to talk about reflected power, the subject of
the thread. That's a broad subject. Perhaps the originator erred in
choosing
that broad of a subject but he chose that subject nevertheless. All of my
postings to this thread have been about reflected power, including this
one,
in defense of my postings about reflected power.

then obviously you just struck on the convenient subject line and ignored
the original question, subverting the whole thread for your own twisted
use... including the argument that you were not taking over the discussion.
this obviously just raises the noise floor and does nothing to help the
original poster who by now is likely heading for his local library if he is
smart.

Dave wrote:
then obviously you just struck on the convenient subject line and ignored
the original question, ...

Nope, you must have missed the posting where I said I didn't
possess sufficient knowledge to answer the original question
but I was willing to discuss something related to the subject
line for which I do possess sufficient knowledge.

Why all the logical diversions? What are you afraid of?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

If the anser were at the library I'd already have it and wouldn't be here.

--
73
Hank WD5JFR
"Dave" wrote in message
...

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
Dave wrote:
of course it is against guidelines. you were starting a new thread
without
changing the subject. in effect hijacking the thread for your own
discussion.

Of course, it is not against the guidelines as the subject was
"Reflected
Power". I simply continued to talk about reflected power, the subject of
the thread. That's a broad subject. Perhaps the originator erred in
choosing
that broad of a subject but he chose that subject nevertheless. All of
my
postings to this thread have been about reflected power, including this
one,
in defense of my postings about reflected power.

then obviously you just struck on the convenient subject line and ignored
the original question, subverting the whole thread for your own twisted
use... including the argument that you were not taking over the
discussion.
this obviously just raises the noise floor and does nothing to help the
original poster who by now is likely heading for his local library if he
is
smart.