Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message .. . Richard This is in response to your answer of last night. Before going to bed I got out the book REFLECTIONS II by Walt Maxwell W2DU. I'm typing verbatim from page 2-2 and 23-1 for those who don't have the book.page 2-2 "Contrary to what many believe, it is not true that when a transmitter delivers power into a line with reflections, a returning wave sees an internal generator resistance as a dissipative load. Nor is the reflected wave converted to heat and, while at the same time damaging the final amplifier....the reflected power is entirely conserved...." from page 23-1 "One of the most serious misconceptions concerned reflected power reaching the tubes in the RF amplifier of the transmitter. The prevalent, but erroneous thinking was that the reflected power enters the amplifier, causing tube overheating and destruction. However, I dispelled this misconception in the above mentioned publications, using wave-mechanics treatment, discussed here in greater detail, by showing that when the pi-network tank is tuned to resonance, a virtual short circuit to rearward traveling waves is created at the input of the network. Consequently, instead of the reflected power reaching the tubes of the amplifier, it is totally re-reflected toward the load by the virtual short circuit appearing only to waves at the network input". I'm guessing it's a virtual short because the pi-network is resonant but what happens if it is a bit off. Also what happens in a transistor final with no pi? 73 Hank WD5JFR Henry, Here is an example of what you just said. Take a sine wave source, and connect it to a 1/4 wave section of shorted transmission line through a series resistor R. The reflected wave will reach this resistor 1/2 cycle later, and will be in phase with the source. For a lossless transmission line, there will be *0 Volts across the resistor*. There will be 0 current through the resistor, and the reflected wave will be re reflected for all values of R, including R=Z0, because the reflected wave will not "know" what R is. You can get the same answer from knowing that the impedance looking into a 1/4 wave section of shorted transmission line is infinite. Tam/WB2TT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tam/WB2TT wrote:
You can get the same answer from knowing that the impedance looking into a 1/4 wave section of shorted transmission line is infinite. Ever measure the forward and reflected currents halfway into a shorted 1/4WL stub? How can currents be flowing unimpeded into and out of an infinite impedance? Hint: it's the net current that is zero at the input of a 1/4WL stub. The forward current and reflected current are equal in magnitude and opposite in phase. Their individual magnitudes can be very large. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil wrote,
Ever measure the forward and reflected currents halfway into a shorted 1/4WL stub? How can currents be flowing unimpeded into and out of an infinite impedance? In the case of a lossless, 1/4WL stub, (no such thing, except on this newsgroup) in the steady state you can disconnect the transmitter and the currents will still be there. Current doesn't flow, Cecil, charge flows. Current is just the rate of flow of charge, dQ/dt. In a 1/4WL stub, charge, and the fields associated with it, are in a state of oscillation. Over time, their average movement in space is zero. It's too bad you have to think of current as like the water in a big river that has to flow from one place to another in order to exist. (That's wrong, too. Current in a river is the rate of flow of water past a point, not the water itself.) Sloppy semantics sure screw up understanding. 73, Tom Donaly, KA6RUH |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tdonaly wrote:
In the case of a lossless, 1/4WL stub, (no such thing, except on this newsgroup) in the steady state you can disconnect the transmitter and the currents will still be there. Since that configuration doesn't exist in reality, only God can cause what you are asserting. Why am I not surprised that you need a supernatural being to prove your arguments? Current doesn't flow, Cecil, charge flows. :-) :-) Having to resort to trivial arguments is the sure sign of a loser. :-) :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Tam/WB2TT wrote: You can get the same answer from knowing that the impedance looking into a 1/4 wave section of shorted transmission line is infinite. Ever measure the forward and reflected currents halfway into a shorted 1/4WL stub? How can currents be flowing unimpeded into and out of an infinite impedance? The question is a little misleading because the direction of the flow of current changes every half cycle and is transverse, or orthogonal to the direction of wave propagation. In a transmission line, the current flows through Z0, ostensibly, which is essentially the impedance from one conductor to the other at every point along the transmission line. Other than that, superposed forward and reflected waves behave just as you described, naturally. 73, Jim AC6XG |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Cecil Moore wrote: Tam/WB2TT wrote: You can get the same answer from knowing that the impedance looking into a 1/4 wave section of shorted transmission line is infinite. Ever measure the forward and reflected currents halfway into a shorted 1/4WL stub? How can currents be flowing unimpeded into and out of an infinite impedance? The question is a little misleading because the direction of the flow of current changes every half cycle and is transverse, or orthogonal to the direction of wave propagation. In a transmission line, the current flows through Z0, ostensibly, which is essentially the impedance from one conductor to the other at every point along the transmission line. Other than that, superposed forward and reflected waves behave just as you described, naturally. 73, Jim AC6XG There is no current in the steady state. The steady state voltage is independent of source impedance, which affect only how long it takes to reach that. I ran a simulation on this, and you can see that as the voltage builds up, the current decreases Tam |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tam/WB2TT wrote: "Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Cecil Moore wrote: Tam/WB2TT wrote: You can get the same answer from knowing that the impedance looking into a 1/4 wave section of shorted transmission line is infinite. Ever measure the forward and reflected currents halfway into a shorted 1/4WL stub? How can currents be flowing unimpeded into and out of an infinite impedance? The question is a little misleading because the direction of the flow of current changes every half cycle and is transverse, or orthogonal to the direction of wave propagation. In a transmission line, the current flows through Z0, ostensibly, which is essentially the impedance from one conductor to the other at every point along the transmission line. Other than that, superposed forward and reflected waves behave just as you described, naturally. 73, Jim AC6XG There is no current in the steady state. The steady state voltage is independent of source impedance, which affect only how long it takes to reach that. I ran a simulation on this, and you can see that as the voltage builds up, the current decreases Tam Hi Tam, The simulation would be fun to play with. What do you use? 73 de jk |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
SWCAD from Linear. I also built up a model of an ideal SWR meter.
Tam |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tam/WB2TT wrote: SWCAD from Linear. I also built up a model of an ideal SWR meter. Tam I almost bought LLTC when they came out with that. Should have. Thanks Tam. jk |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tam/WB2TT wrote:
There is no current in the steady state. There is no *net* current in the steady state at the input of a shorted 1/4WL stub. What do you think the current at the short is? How did that large amount of current get there without flowing? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |