Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 25 May 2004 19:01:31 -0500, Tom Ring
wrote: Boy, I'm gonna have to try and find my old EE5xx Non-Linear Transistor Design notebook. I doubt I could translate it into words for this section of the thread, but it is incredibly applicable. Hi Tom, It's not that difficult. Edison corrupted the Thevenin model demanding that there be a RESISTANCE equal to the load to accomplish this equivalency (a case of being overly literal for a market advantage). The Thevenin model only requires an IMPEDANCE, hence these allusions to 50% maximum efficiency (an imposed condition much like debate here) were an invention by Edison to detract investment away from AC power transmission and attract it back to his DC dynamos. The real pro's new how to dance with numbers and concepts too. This resolves how the common Ham rig can present 50 Ohms Impedance and still offer more than 50% efficiency - although, a simple examination of the power in vs. the power out reveals it isn't nearly as good as 50% for ANY mode. Such is the gulf between reality and theory - some folk's mileage may vary. ;-) 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |