Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #2   Report Post  
Old May 26th 04, 07:20 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cec and Co., I keep telling you it's a waste of bandwidth talking about
'conjugate matches'. In the transmitter/transmission line context conjugate
matches do not exist because nobody knows what the internal impedance of the
transmitter actually is.

There's never any need to know. Of what possible use would it be if you knew
it.?

Except provide a topic of conversation for this newsgroup. ;o)


  #3   Report Post  
Old May 26th 04, 11:38 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
Cec and Co., I keep telling you it's a waste of bandwidth talking about
'conjugate matches'. In the transmitter/transmission line context conjugate
matches do not exist because nobody knows what the internal impedance of the
transmitter actually is.


If nobody knows what the internal impedance of a transmitter
actually is, how do you know it's not conjugate matched? :-)
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #4   Report Post  
Old May 26th 04, 11:56 PM
Reg Edwards
 
Posts: n/a
Default

If nobody knows what the internal impedance of a transmitter
actually is, how do you know it's not conjugate matched? :-)

--------------------------------

Because nobody knows. And it wouldn't make slightest difference to anything
if anyone did.

And nobody knows why I keep answering your questions either. ;o)
---
Yours, Reggie.


  #5   Report Post  
Old May 27th 04, 01:37 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 26 May 2004 21:56:04 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote:

If nobody knows what the internal impedance of a transmitter
actually is, how do you know it's not conjugate matched? :-)

--------------------------------

Because nobody knows. And it wouldn't make slightest difference to anything
if anyone did.


Lord Kelvinator is mighty proud of you, bucko.

And nobody knows why I keep answering your questions either. ;o)


You didn't answer any question, you responded - big difference.

We at least get the varietal name of the grape you are knocking back.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo Dr. Slick Antenna 198 September 24th 03 07:19 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 03:27 AM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 09:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017