| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Richard Clark wrote:
(Richard Harrison) wrote: Yes, but "To secure maximum power output from a generator whose emf and whose internal impedance are constant, the load must have an impedance equal to the conjugate of the generator`s internal impedance." (page 43, "Transmission Lines, Antennas, and Wave Guides", King, Mimno, and Wing) Not if it is strictly resistive. Of course, it works for the purely resistive. R+j0 is the conjugate of R-j0 -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cec and Co., I keep telling you it's a waste of bandwidth talking about
'conjugate matches'. In the transmitter/transmission line context conjugate matches do not exist because nobody knows what the internal impedance of the transmitter actually is. There's never any need to know. Of what possible use would it be if you knew it.? Except provide a topic of conversation for this newsgroup. ;o) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reg Edwards wrote:
Cec and Co., I keep telling you it's a waste of bandwidth talking about 'conjugate matches'. In the transmitter/transmission line context conjugate matches do not exist because nobody knows what the internal impedance of the transmitter actually is. If nobody knows what the internal impedance of a transmitter actually is, how do you know it's not conjugate matched? :-) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
If nobody knows what the internal impedance of a transmitter
actually is, how do you know it's not conjugate matched? :-) -------------------------------- Because nobody knows. And it wouldn't make slightest difference to anything if anyone did. And nobody knows why I keep answering your questions either. ;o) --- Yours, Reggie. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 26 May 2004 21:56:04 +0000 (UTC), "Reg Edwards"
wrote: If nobody knows what the internal impedance of a transmitter actually is, how do you know it's not conjugate matched? :-) -------------------------------- Because nobody knows. And it wouldn't make slightest difference to anything if anyone did. Lord Kelvinator is mighty proud of you, bucko. And nobody knows why I keep answering your questions either. ;o) You didn't answer any question, you responded - big difference. We at least get the varietal name of the grape you are knocking back. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
| Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||