LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #25   Report Post  
Old May 26th 04, 11:23 PM
JGBOYLES
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why must engineere resort to quoting from their worshipped Guru's who are
hardly more likely to be correct than they are themslves.


That's easy, because most of the time we have no other choice. When designing
circuits, antennas, troubleshooting, or talking to newsgroups, we have to rely
on other's research. There is no way we can experimentally verify all the data
sheets. charts, graphs, computer programs ect. that are available.
Quoting the last 100 years of antenna research, from worshipped Guru's should
not be a bad thing, because most of us will never have the opportunity to prove
them incorrect. I assume many of the Guru's did the research.
Reg, I am sure you have found numerous errors in Guru's texts, and have tried
to point them out to us. But you cant't just go out in the back yard and burn
all those books:-) Who would we then quote?
73 Gary N4AST


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo Dr. Slick Antenna 198 September 24th 03 06:19 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? Dr. Slick Antenna 140 August 18th 03 08:17 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017