Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Reg Edwards wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote The fact that transmission lines with high SWRs suffer more losses than transmission lines with low SWRs proves your statement to be incorrect. =========================== Cec, you chose the wrong argument! It proves nothing. A 600-ohm open-wire line with high SWR can have a higher loss than even a coaxial line with 1-to-1 SWR. That was his point, Reg. But it only shows that energy is transferred from the source to the losses at high SWR - not that more energy bounces around. What's Cecil say? I've been seduced by the steady-state, and I don't understand what actually happens? Only people who have opened themselves to the ideals of Reflectology and the Melles-Griot translations, follow the true light. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |