Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: I can't explain how but I certainly can explain why. I know why - because it's the only way you can understand. It just doesn't happen to be true - as evidenced by the lack of any physical explanation for it. The 'why' is conservation of energy. If there are only two directions available and energy was traveling in one direction and now it isn't, it's a no-brainer to realize that it must have changed directions. I'm sorry that you don't believe in the conservation of energy theorem, Jim. Do you boss know that? So far you have failed every challenge to disprove the why. Wonder why? -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |