Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tam/WB2TT wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... The 'why' is conservation of energy. If there are only two directions available and energy was traveling in one direction and now it isn't, it's a no-brainer to realize that it must have changed directions. Cecil, I think a more convincing argument is that I can take a slotted line and directly measure a standing wave on it. A wave traveling in one direction can not do that. Or am I cunfusing things? Tam/WB2TT No. That's right. But the point is - how much energy is actually moving past the probe? Cecil seems to believe that a standing wave is more than a superposition of voltages. It would be easy to mistake that as a superposition of energies. But one can only superpose vector quantities. 73, Jim AC6XG |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna |