| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
whoa
system is: source - line - load If there are impedance mismatches, in the steady state (ie 3 microseconds after key down); There will be more energy in the transmission line and the source than there would be if all the impedances were matched. This is necessary to satisfy the boundary conditions imposed on Maxwell's Equations at each end of the transmission line. The losses are the rent you pay for storing the energy; See bazookas for a good example. To the radiated energy moving past the probe one must add the losses. That's why I prefer antennas with no reflections. Reflect on that. If you really want a book Paul Dirac's "Quantum Mechanics" is sweet. Or Hawking's "The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time." My cat, Hiram P Maxim (Max for short, he likes sleeping on the S-Line I've had since '63), just walked over the keys and approves. 73 H. NQ5H "Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Tam/WB2TT wrote: "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... The 'why' is conservation of energy. If there are only two directions available and energy was traveling in one direction and now it isn't, it's a no-brainer to realize that it must have changed directions. Cecil, I think a more convincing argument is that I can take a slotted line and directly measure a standing wave on it. A wave traveling in one direction can not do that. Or am I cunfusing things? Tam/WB2TT No. That's right. But the point is - how much energy is actually moving past the probe? Cecil seems to believe that a standing wave is more than a superposition of voltages. It would be easy to mistake that as a superposition of energies. But one can only superpose vector quantities. 73, Jim AC6XG |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Rho = (Zload-Zo*)/(Zload+Zo), for complex Zo | Antenna | |||
| Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
| Length of Coax Affecting Incident Power to Meter? | Antenna | |||