Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crazy George wrote:
"---do a bibliographic search of Engineering Index, or Scientific Abstracts, or whatever that school has access to." Excellent advice from George. Motorola`s Extender usually included a switch on the radio control head to enable or defeat Extender operation. The only reason I can think of to defeat Extender operation is to demonstrate its effectiveness, which can be compelling. The Extender works early and often to put a hole in the radio`s response before adverse effects are generated within. The holes rarely detract significantly from the signal. Also look for Motorola TEK 21 Pulse Generator instructions. It is a hand-held, battery-operated, zener diode noise maker used to optimize Extender performance in the radio. The TEK 21 saves overheating a car engine just to make ignition noise pulses to obliterate while tweaking the Extender circuit and the the radio`s response. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, be aware that the "Extender" is somewhat different from the typical
noise blanker (at least in RCA units), in that these actually have a SEPERATE reciever, that can be tuned to a nearby (but not necessarly the same frequency) that you are trying to eliminate noise on. The output of this is used to control a preamp on the frequency that you are operateing on. This has a major advantage over the typical noise blanker, in that , a strong nearby signal won't overload the extender , if it is aligned 2, or 3 megs away from the frequency range you want to operate (unlike in a transciever, which operats at the IF frequency ). As a side note, these make great noise blankers for 6 meters, and are virtually overload proof. Been there, done that! Jim NN7K Richard wrote:... Crazy George wrote: "---do a bibliographic search of Engineering Index, or Scientific Abstracts, or whatever that school has access to." Excellent advice from George. Motorola`s Extender usually included a switch on the radio control head to enable or defeat Extender operation. The only reason I can think of to defeat Extender operation is to demonstrate its effectiveness, which can be compelling. The Extender works early and often to put a hole in the radio`s response before adverse effects are generated within. The holes rarely detract significantly from the signal. Also look for Motorola TEK 21 Pulse Generator instructions. It is a hand-held, battery-operated, zener diode noise maker used to optimize Extender performance in the radio. The TEK 21 saves overheating a car engine just to make ignition noise pulses to obliterate while tweaking the Extender circuit and the the radio`s response. Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Richard Harrison" wrote in message
... Crazy George wrote: "---do a bibliographic search of Engineering Index, or Scientific Abstracts, or whatever that school has access to." Excellent advice from George. Motorola`s Extender usually included a switch on the radio control head to enable or defeat Extender operation. The only reason I can think of to defeat Extender operation is to demonstrate its effectiveness, which can be compelling. Richard: One of the problems with the first production Extenders was no limit on the total duration blanking. Since the individual pulse length was fixed, it was possible to get 100% blanking on a readable signal, with the right noise pulse length and rate. Motorola figured this out about the same time we did, and quietly modified the circuitry to limit total blanking percentage. On the other hand, the salesmen with one noisy spark plug in their demo vehicles loved the switch. But, that's been 40+ years ago, and the details are hazy. -- Crazy George Remove NO and SPAM from return address snip Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|