Tam/WB2TT wrote:
Actually I am encouraged. There is a lot less divergence than during the Dr.
Slick postings. I have learned things, either from actual postings, or from
having to look things up in the literature.

Challenges that the steady-state religion has failed to answer:

How can a standing-wave exist without a forward-traveling wave
superposed with a rearward-traveling wave?

How does reflected wave momentum change directions?

Why does a TDR indicate that reflections actually exist?

What causes TV ghosting in a transmission line if reflections
don't exist?

How does radar work if reflections don't exist?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Cecil Moore wrote:
Challenges that the steady-state religion has failed to answer:

How can a standing-wave exist without a forward-traveling wave
superposed with a rearward-traveling wave?

How does reflected wave momentum change directions?

Why does a TDR indicate that reflections actually exist?

What causes TV ghosting in a transmission line if reflections
don't exist?

How does radar work if reflections don't exist?

That's what puts the straw in the men, and the red in the herrings.
If it's a reflection, then it must be power! Nothing else reflects,
evidently.

73, ac6xg

Jim Kelley wrote:
That's what puts the straw in the men, and the red in the herrings.
If it's a reflection, then it must be power! Nothing else reflects,
evidently.

Please make some sort of a technical assertion instead of your
usual metaphysical cagada. Any energy passing a point *is* power,
by IEEE definition.

When you view your reflection in a mirror, do you ignore the
ExB power involved without which you would see nothing?
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Mon, 24 May 2004 18:35:39 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
When you view your reflection in a mirror, do you ignore the
ExB power involved without which you would see nothing?
You would if it were a conjugate mirror.

wow

And I thought Maxwell/Heaviside/Gibbs
Gauss/Fourier
Newton.......

-- oh never mind.

This was beaten to death over 100 years ago.

Resonate your antennas, best radiation efficiency.
Match your impedances.

Get on the air.
Meet people who are mostly still stupid at this level.

Join the Spiderwebnet on 14.347 every morning at 8 Eastern.
The 7290 Traffic Net has been around since I was an eighth grade ham.
Every morning at 10 AM local Texas time.
They only skip Sundays.








--------------------------------------------------
And the Real "God" who set off the BIG BANG,
You the real deal, so am I.
Bless the Maritime Mobile Service Net.
14.3
----------------------------------------------------






I check in as best I can.

H.
NQ5H


"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
...
snip
by IEEE definition.
deletia

Cecil Moore wrote:

Jim Kelley wrote:
That's what puts the straw in the men, and the red in the herrings.
If it's a reflection, then it must be power! Nothing else reflects,
evidently.

Please make some sort of a technical assertion instead of your
usual metaphysical cagada.

After you, sir. :-)

Any energy passing a point *is* power,
by IEEE definition.

That's an equality, not a definition. I suspect you're not completely
comfortable with the difference in those two things.

When you view your reflection in a mirror, do you ignore the
ExB power involved without which you would see nothing?

I don't notice it until it the resulting chemical reaction takes place
on the retina of my eye. Until then, I can only imagine E crossing B,
and write the expression for it down on a piece of paper as it has no
physical manifestation.

73, Jim AC6XG

Cecil Moore wrote in message ...
Jim Kelley wrote:
That's what puts the straw in the men, and the red in the herrings.
If it's a reflection, then it must be power! Nothing else reflects,
evidently.

Please make some sort of a technical assertion instead of your
usual metaphysical cagada.

I had to look it up:

Cagada: Mistake or disloyalty. Vulgar expression, as all words
belonging to this "family"

Cagadera: Diarrhea. Vulgar expression

Cagar: Besides meaning "to ****", it means bother, annoy, betray,
cheat. Vulgar expression

Cagar a pedos: Criticize violently. Vulgar expression

Richard Fry wrote:
"To me, the threads about reflected power in this NG over the last few
days are rather revealing. Some posters quote Terman, Lord Kelvin and
others with inapplicable/incomplete statements---."

You are affgorded ample opportunity to specify the inapplicability or
omissions. The only mistake I know of in Terman`s 1955 edition is a typo
in one instance only where KHz is substituted for MHz or vice versa, and
I can`t find that one right now.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI