Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 26 May 2004 06:35:16 -0400, "David J Windisch"
wrote: (How) Is it possible with metrology (that I can afford, much less obtain use thereof), for me to know without a reasonable doubt what the proportions of plate-glow due to little-r-sub-little-p and "reflected power from the mismatch" are? Are there other sources of plate glow? Hi David, Two methods come to mind: Calorimetry and Optical Thermometry. Both are ancient methods, which means with patience and care you can achieve very good precision and decent accuracy. For the Calorimetric approach, simply enclose the tube inside an air plenum with a good steady stream of air whose temperature is measured going in, and coming out. To increase efficiency and accuracy, you would want to build a diffuser into the stream to reduce turbulence (a 4 in diameter honey comb of straws cut 3 or 4 inches long would do nicely). It would also be nice to draw the air from a relatively stable temperature source and vent it away (no mixing). You would then need to research the formulas to convert the heat gain into watts. I won't go into that at this time. As for the Optical Pyrometer (the actual term), this consists of a binocular where one eye looks at the plate surface, and the other eye is looking at a heated wire. An alternative is a monocular where the eye looks at both at the same time (more accurate) where the wire overlays the target image. You adjust the heated wire to luminescence and when its temperature is equal to the temperature of the target, the monocular view will offer the wire disappearing! In other words, you have a bridge circuit and when both heated elements are balanced the eye registers a null. You would need a stable source of repeatable current settings so that you can make differential measurements (the most precision) and perhaps another target that you can directly measure heat and power applied (the most accurate). For a wire, go to a junk store and buy an old toaster. Each element is roughly 50 Ohms (not suitable for precision RF however). Such a method can with care map temperatures to within degrees. I commend your desire to sit down to the bench and sweep away the cobwebs of musty philosophies traded here. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Complex Z0 [Corrected] | Antenna | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
The Cecilian Gambit, a variation on the Galilean Defense revisited | Antenna |