LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old June 4th 04, 06:51 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 09:55:56 -0700, Jim Kelley
wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
Good grief, Jim, ExB is proportional to the irradiance of a light beam.


Good grief, Cecil, irradiance isn't a field and doesn't propagates
either!


Hi Jim,

Nearly every posting that Cecil pens with his rustic understanding of
Optics suffers from the obvious lack of experience.

There is a certain amount of pretense in this irradiance (an archaic
radiometric term used incorrectly for photometrics in an argument that
calls for luminous flux), much like quoting I²R and not knowing what
Ohms or Amperes are.

He's lucky there are so very few that appreciate the gaffs of his
unintended humor.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017