| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Fuller wrote:
I explained this to Walt in some private e-mails about 18 months ago, and I wrote similar explanations in this group. I was vilified by both Walt and you. I still believe that neither model is perfectly consistent. I do believe that an S-parameter analysis is perfectly consistent. Both the Walter Maxwell model and the Steve Best model for this transmission line problem work correctly. They are internally self consistent, and they give the same physical answers. But how can Steve deny the 100% re-reflected energy premise when all the energy winds up at the load? How did it get to the load if it was not re-reflected at the match point? TV ghosting proves that it is indeed re-reflected at the match point. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |