LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #30   Report Post  
Old June 8th 04, 11:43 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Walter Maxwell wrote:
This means that the system is matched and thus the re-reflected
voltage equals the reflected voltage.


No! NO! NO! The voltage re-reflected from any physical impedance
discontinuity equals the reflected voltage times the physical reflection
coefficient. That is the S-parameter term s22(a2). s22 is the physical
reflection coefficient. a2 is the reflected voltage incident upon port 2.

If the reflected voltage is 70.7V and the physical voltage reflection
coefficient is 0.5, then the re-reflected voltage is 35.35V. This is
all explained in HP's AN 95-1 on S-parameter analysis.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017