Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello!
I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. 73 Ben / SM0KBW |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 16, 10:56*pm, Ben / SM0KBW wrote:
Hello! I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. 73 Ben / SM0KBW If it helps, I recall a long-ago rule for perforated and mesh satellite dishes. The hole diameter could be up to one-tenth wavelength and the reflector surface would still appear solid to the EM waves. I had a 3m mesh dish for 4 Ghz c-band TV. It consisted of twelve unconnected panels. I'd say try it. From my imagination: If you were to set up a normal VSWR test with your 23 cm gear and move a section of the mesh toward the antenna, you'd know somewhat whether the mesh is a reflector or is RF- transparent. Compare the VSWR change to a corresponding test using solid material. Just a thought from my fertile brain (with no mention of what kind of fertilizer). |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Markham skrev 2012-01-19 06:49:
On Jan 16, 10:56 pm, Ben / wrote: Hello! I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. 73 Ben / SM0KBW If it helps, I recall a long-ago rule for perforated and mesh satellite dishes. The hole diameter could be up to one-tenth wavelength and the reflector surface would still appear solid to the EM waves. I had a 3m mesh dish for 4 Ghz c-band TV. It consisted of twelve unconnected panels. Yes, those rules do trigger something in my brail too ![]() I'd say try it. From my imagination: If you were to set up a normal VSWR test with your 23 cm gear and move a section of the mesh toward the antenna, you'd know somewhat whether the mesh is a reflector or is RF- transparent. Compare the VSWR change to a corresponding test using solid material. Just a thought from my fertile brain (with no mention of what kind of fertilizer). Of course, you right, empirical is certainly a good way to decide if the net is good enough. The secret fertilizer you use seems to work ![]() 73 Ben / SM0KBW |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ben / SM0KBW skrev 2012-01-19 07:34:
John Markham skrev 2012-01-19 06:49: On Jan 16, 10:56 pm, Ben / wrote: Hello! I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. 73 Ben / SM0KBW If it helps, I recall a long-ago rule for perforated and mesh satellite dishes. The hole diameter could be up to one-tenth wavelength and the reflector surface would still appear solid to the EM waves. I had a 3m mesh dish for 4 Ghz c-band TV. It consisted of twelve unconnected panels. Yes, those rules do trigger something in my brail too ![]() Typo should have been brain not brail!! I'd say try it. From my imagination: If you were to set up a normal VSWR test with your 23 cm gear and move a section of the mesh toward the antenna, you'd know somewhat whether the mesh is a reflector or is RF- transparent. Compare the VSWR change to a corresponding test using solid material. Just a thought from my fertile brain (with no mention of what kind of fertilizer). Of course, you right, empirical is certainly a good way to decide if the net is good enough. The secret fertilizer you use seems to work ![]() 73 Ben / SM0KBW |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:56:44 +0100, Ben / SM0KBW wrote:
I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. Approximate diameter? How much gain to you need (or expect)? The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? It won't reduce the gain, but you're going to have another form of entertainment. Because the wires in the mesh are not electrically connected (welded), you run the risk of creating small diodes at each crossover as the aluminum oxidizes. Similarly, as the wind blows through the mesh, the wires will scrape against each other, creating small sparks. I found this problem the hard way when I built a 1.7GHz WEFAX dish using aluminum window screen material. I spent a few months trying to isolate the highly intermittent noise sources. I eventually smeared spray glue on the window screen mesh, and plastered it with aluminum foil, which eliminated all the noise sources. Note the C-Band DBS dishes may have holes in the mesh, but the mesh itself is solid sheet metal. The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. A 1.2GHz dish will probably be big. You're going to have some structural issues to deal with. If you build a deep dish, getting the wire mesh to make the required bends is going to be difficult, unless you build it in wedges. If you build a flat dish, the mesh is easier to handle, but the support for the feed might be ridiculously long. I suggest you read the details of dish design, especially the part on matching the f/D (focal length / Diameter) of the dish, to the illumination angle of the feed, which has a big effect on the dish efficiency: http://www.w1ghz.org/antbook/contents.htm Mesh dish kits: http://www.rfhamdesign.com/products/parabolicdishkit/dishconstruction/index.html -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann wrote:
Note the C-Band DBS dishes may have holes in the mesh, but the mesh itself is solid sheet metal. Long ago and far away, I had one of those. It was not made of mesh, it was made of a piece of sheet metal that had been perforated. The holes have to be exact, besides the problems Jeff mentioned, they have to be small enough and properly spaced that the dish still acts as a reflector at the frequencies desired. That's why Ku band (10gHz) dishes are usually solid. The mesh would have to be very fine and precise. The holes are not there to make it cheaper to produce the dishes, they are to reduce weight and wind loading. I assume in colder climates they are also there to reduce build up of rain water or snow. Here in Jerusalem we have snow storms every 4-5 years. The last one was enough that the snow caused our satellite dish to malfunction, which was not welcomed by two kids stuck at home. Due to the rarity of the snowfalls, the hilly terrain and the warm temperatures, schools just close for the day of the storm and then reopen the next day after it has all melted. Geoff. -- Geoffrey S. Mendelson, N3OWJ/4X1GM My high blood pressure medicine reduces my midichlorian count. :-( |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jeff Liebermann skrev 2012-01-19 08:54:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:56:44 +0100, Ben / wrote: I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. Approximate diameter? How much gain to you need (or expect)? The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? It won't reduce the gain, but you're going to have another form of entertainment. Because the wires in the mesh are not electrically connected (welded), you run the risk of creating small diodes at each crossover as the aluminum oxidizes. Similarly, as the wind blows through the mesh, the wires will scrape against each other, creating small sparks. I found this problem the hard way when I built a 1.7GHz WEFAX dish using aluminum window screen material. I spent a few months trying to isolate the highly intermittent noise sources. I eventually smeared spray glue on the window screen mesh, and plastered it with aluminum foil, which eliminated all the noise sources. Note the C-Band DBS dishes may have holes in the mesh, but the mesh itself is solid sheet metal. The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. A 1.2GHz dish will probably be big. You're going to have some structural issues to deal with. If you build a deep dish, getting the wire mesh to make the required bends is going to be difficult, unless you build it in wedges. If you build a flat dish, the mesh is easier to handle, but the support for the feed might be ridiculously long. I suggest you read the details of dish design, especially the part on matching the f/D (focal length / Diameter) of the dish, to the illumination angle of the feed, which has a big effect on the dish efficiency: http://www.w1ghz.org/antbook/contents.htm Mesh dish kits: http://www.rfhamdesign.com/products/parabolicdishkit/dishconstruction/index.html I'm interested to do some experiment with the stress dish concept: http://www.nitehawk.com/432_MHz_EME/port_dish.pdf The antenna is to be used at my country cottage, I don't want to convert it to a modern communication centre ![]() and it can snow heavily at occasions. The stress dish would be perfect to do some experiment with in the summer period and then put it aside for the winter. 4m in diameter is the plan, I expect a gain just below 30dB, if I'm lucky. The noise would be a real problem as the ultimate goal is to use the antenna in EME works. Maybe a traditional galvanized chicken net is a better choice? There are nets with 13*13 mm, around 1/17 lambda witch should be OK. Ben / SM0KBW |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:56:44 +0100, Ben / SM0KBW wrote:
Hello! I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. 73 Ben / SM0KBW If these work at 2.5 GHz, I think you'll be able to use about anything as long as the parabola is correct. http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/ page04.html |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:46:40 -0600, dave wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:56:44 +0100, Ben / SM0KBW wrote: Hello! I'm planning to build a parabolic reflector using aluminium net. The kind of net i found is just a weave of aluminium threads, no connnection between the threads. Is this going to reduce the performance of the reflector? The net is built of 0.4 mm thread and the hole size is 1.5 * 1.5 mm. I'm planning to use the reflector on the 23 cm band. 73 Ben / SM0KBW If these work at 2.5 GHz, I think you'll be able to use about anything as long as the parabola is correct. http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/ page04.html http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/pi...4dB_dish-1.jpg |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 19 Jan 2012 08:59:04 +0000 (UTC), "Geoffrey S. Mendelson"
wrote: Jeff Liebermann wrote: Note the C-Band DBS dishes may have holes in the mesh, but the mesh itself is solid sheet metal. Long ago and far away, I had one of those. It was not made of mesh, it was made of a piece of sheet metal that had been perforated. The holes have to be exact, besides the problems Jeff mentioned, they have to be small enough and properly spaced that the dish still acts as a reflector at the frequencies desired. That's why Ku band (10gHz) dishes are usually solid. The mesh would have to be very fine and precise. Ummm... 10GHz is X band and DBS Ku band is 13Ghz. There are a few wire mess and/or perforated sheet metal dishes available for DBS satellite TV. http://i01.i.aliimg.com/photo/v1/475037631/KU_BAND_75CM_SATELLITE_MESH_DISH_ANTENNA.jpg The holes are not there to make it cheaper to produce the dishes, they are to reduce weight and wind loading. I assume in colder climates they are also there to reduce build up of rain water or snow. Nope. There are black teflon coated dishes for that. Some have heater wires imbedded in the fiberglass reflector. Also radomes. The problem with ice and mesh is that the mesh is generally weaker than a solid dish. Once encrusted with ice, the mesh might rip, bend, or tear. Here in Jerusalem we have snow storms every 4-5 years. The last one was enough that the snow caused our satellite dish to malfunction, which was not welcomed by two kids stuck at home. Due to the rarity of the snowfalls, the hilly terrain and the warm temperatures, schools just close for the day of the storm and then reopen the next day after it has all melted. Paint it with glossy black paint. I did that to some white fiberglass antennas. The ice just slides off the antenna once the sun appears. It's not a total solution, but it helps. -- Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Parabolic Dish Questions | Antenna | |||
2 opposite parabolic reflectors in a single directional WIFI antenna? | Antenna | |||
Parabolic reflector for Wi-Fi? | Antenna | |||
Parabolic dish gives weak performance increase | Antenna | |||
Vet. with a reflector | Antenna |