LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old August 8th 03, 08:47 PM
W5DXP
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ed Senior wrote:
I am rather bemused by the responses you got suggesting a one-size-fits-all
ladder-line doublet instead. I'm sure these can be good antennas; but
they usually seem to be presented by their advocates as having no draw-
backs at all. That would be an incorrect view, as those antennas have
their own tradeoffs--just like other antennas.

The biggest tradeoff is the tuner, of course.


I use the transmission line to tune my 130 ft. dipole, no tuner needed.

Meanwhile, I'm enjoying six bands, instant QSY, no tuner needed, and
I run power when I want to.


I'm enjoying eight bands, throw a couple of knife switches to QSY,
no tuner needed, and I run power when I want to. Also no messing
with the interaction of multiple legs of dipoles.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
80 m Dipole Dave Shrader Antenna 24 August 7th 03 02:50 AM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM
Dipole connected to grounded receiver? Tom Antenna 4 July 22nd 03 11:19 PM
Dipole questions Raphael Clancy Antenna 5 July 18th 03 06:12 PM
Unequal length dipole arms Ron Antenna 9 July 12th 03 09:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017