Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Senior wrote:
I am rather bemused by the responses you got suggesting a one-size-fits-all ladder-line doublet instead. I'm sure these can be good antennas; but they usually seem to be presented by their advocates as having no draw- backs at all. That would be an incorrect view, as those antennas have their own tradeoffs--just like other antennas. The biggest tradeoff is the tuner, of course. I use the transmission line to tune my 130 ft. dipole, no tuner needed. Meanwhile, I'm enjoying six bands, instant QSY, no tuner needed, and I run power when I want to. I'm enjoying eight bands, throw a couple of knife switches to QSY, no tuner needed, and I run power when I want to. Also no messing with the interaction of multiple legs of dipoles. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
80 m Dipole | Antenna | |||
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? | Antenna | |||
Dipole connected to grounded receiver? | Antenna | |||
Dipole questions | Antenna | |||
Unequal length dipole arms | Antenna |