![]() |
Increasing Cable TV signal strength
On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:04:58 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell"
wrote: 3: You know nothing about CATV franchises. 'A measly 100 feet' is more than adequate for a hell of a lot of drops & house wiring. If that is what the franchise calls for, THAT IS THE SPECIFICATION, no matter how much you whine like Sloman. A city or county won't pull a franchise over one or two people complaining about weak signals. They receive a fixed percentage of the system revenue every month, and the percentage was set when the economy was up. If they pull the franchise, another provider will offer a much lower percentage. It also involves legal fees, and causes the rates to go up for the users. Why put up with all that for a fraction of a percent of problems. Like people who built a private road a mile long and want to pay the standard install fee when it will cost about $15,000 to run a feeder for that one house. Or like that marina. It isn't a street. It's private property. If they want better service, let them pay for upgrades with .500 cable to each boat, with a .500 to 'F" connector for each boat. That would only cost a few hundred dollars a boat for materials. More if the cable is jacketed. If it isn't it won't last long in salt air. Double that for the hardware and labor to get a good idea of the costs. Oh, that's right. You're too cheap to even have cable TV. Read more carefully. I said TV doesn't matter to us, it is not about cost. Then why are you being such an ignorant prick about the issue when you have no horse in the race? You sound more like Dimbulb every day. I used to think highly of you, but no longer Geez Michael, one stupid thread and you trash years of positive experience? Just the same, i didn't expect him to even think of pretending knowledge where he was not well versed in the specific area under discussion. -- You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense. |
Increasing Cable TV signal strength
josephkk wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:04:58 -0500, "Michael A. Terrell" wrote: 3: You know nothing about CATV franchises. 'A measly 100 feet' is more than adequate for a hell of a lot of drops & house wiring. If that is what the franchise calls for, THAT IS THE SPECIFICATION, no matter how much you whine like Sloman. A city or county won't pull a franchise over one or two people complaining about weak signals. They receive a fixed percentage of the system revenue every month, and the percentage was set when the economy was up. If they pull the franchise, another provider will offer a much lower percentage. It also involves legal fees, and causes the rates to go up for the users. Why put up with all that for a fraction of a percent of problems. Like people who built a private road a mile long and want to pay the standard install fee when it will cost about $15,000 to run a feeder for that one house. Or like that marina. It isn't a street. It's private property. If they want better service, let them pay for upgrades with .500 cable to each boat, with a .500 to 'F" connector for each boat. That would only cost a few hundred dollars a boat for materials. More if the cable is jacketed. If it isn't it won't last long in salt air. Double that for the hardware and labor to get a good idea of the costs. Oh, that's right. You're too cheap to even have cable TV. Read more carefully. I said TV doesn't matter to us, it is not about cost. Then why are you being such an ignorant prick about the issue when you have no horse in the race? You sound more like Dimbulb every day. I used to think highly of you, but no longer Geez Michael, one stupid thread and you trash years of positive experience? Just the same, i didn't expect him to even think of pretending knowledge where he was not well versed in the specific area under discussion. I'm in a lot more pain lately, and I'm having a harder time controlling my temper. I am dropping a lot of things, between carpal Tunnel & nerve damage to my hands. I am also tired of hearing lies from doctors. For some reason, my medication for enlarged prostrate was put on hold for 90 days, and not being able to sleep more than an hour or two at a time is starting to get to me after two months without more than four hours sleep a night. There are days that I want them to cut my damn legs off, to get rid of the constant pain. they hurt when I lay down. They hurt when i get up. They hurt when I'm sitting, and when I'm walking. I have been waiting over a year for the proper surgical support stockings, only to be told a few days ago that it's no longer available. I waited over five years for a pair of diabetic shoes. I couldn't find anything that fit, so I was wearing a pair of old shoes that should have been tossed three years ago. 10 years ago my feet were 8.5 wide. Because of Diabetes and circulation problems, they are now 11 EEEEEE (yes, 6E) and some days I have trouble even getting those on. I have 'Turned the other cheek' so many times that I no longer care. -- You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense. |
Increasing Cable TV signal strength
Yes, just call the cable company, tell them you will change to satelite
because it doesn't work. They will do it for nothing and very quickly. "Jim Higgins" wrote in message ... On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:00:12 -0600, amdx wrote: Hi All, I'm on a boat, about 170ft from the utility post. Recently our cable company switched to the wonderful world of Digital TV. I got the new digital converter and had no picture. I took the box back and got a second box, still no picture. So now I suspect a weak signal and confirm that it is the cable length. The cable company came out and gave me a better cable than I had installed. At this point I have a picture but it is intermittent. The signal at the utility post has 3 outputs and had a four way splitter, I suggested the cable guy put in two 2 way splitters and give me the stronger (first) tap. That got my signal to work almost all the time. I'd like to get the signal to work 100% of the time. I don't has access to electricity at the utility post, so an amp is out. Although I could try an amp at the cable box end. Is that reasonable? I would run two cables if there was a way to make it increase signal strength. Getting anymore from the cable company is not an option. Any ideas to get a better signal? Yes, ask the cable company to change the tap in the distribution amplifier from (for example) -40dB to -34 dB. IOW, they can up the signal level in the cable vs installing a lower loss cable. (You're probably at the point where there isn't a significantly lower loss cable available anyhow.) Actually, first ask them to measure your signal strength at the distribution point on your boat where their cable attaches and look over their shoulder as they do that. They have specs and they need to meet their specs. I had a ton of problems with Internet here until doing that - finding they didn't meet their own specs - and when I made them meet their own specs all was fine. They met their specs by changing the tap. |
Increasing Cable TV signal strength
On Feb 8, 4:36*pm, Fred Bloggs
wrote: On Feb 8, 2:00*pm, amdx wrote: Those amps with power inserters, available from Radio Shack for around $40-50 as I recall, do work well, HOWEVER, I have had 2 of them burn out on me. They do run rather hot. But when they work, they usually do the trick. You power it from the TV end and the inline amp has a blocking cap so you don't put DC on the whole system. Theoreticaslly, that is what you need. I think you should put one amp every 50 feet but that may not be possible for you. Use a 15dB gain drop amp with power inserter, but that's just a guess. Would help if you actually knew signal levels like what the receiver requires for optimum reception and what the cable co sources. Putting the amplifier at source gives you a typical system noise figure of 3dB, but putting it at your end limits your NF to 10dB minimum from the start. |
Increasing Cable TV signal strength
AI4QJ wrote: On Feb 8, 4:36 pm, Fred Bloggs wrote: On Feb 8, 2:00 pm, amdx wrote: Those amps with power inserters, available from Radio Shack for around $40-50 as I recall, do work well, HOWEVER, I have had 2 of them burn out on me. They do run rather hot. But when they work, they usually do the trick. You power it from the TV end and the inline amp has a blocking cap so you don't put DC on the whole system. Theoreticaslly, that is what you need. I think you should put one amp every 50 feet but that may not be possible for you. What kind of coax has 10 dB loss per 50 feet, and at what frequency? Those RS amps have no equalization, so the low channels would overlaod the front end, and the high channels would still be snowy if you need more than one or two.. -- You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com