Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:56:16 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:47:52 +0000, Pomegranate *******
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:27:00 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:02:35 +0000, Pomegranate *******
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:44:45 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:12:15 +0000, Pomegranate *******
wrote:

Would you please supply some evidence of your claims?

You don't even know what a 10Gb/s optical port looks like either,
jackass.

You are truly pathetic, and a total loser.

The only response a retard like you knows is "stalk and jab".

Would you please supply some evidence of your claims?


You wouldn't know what a constellation measurement was if one bit you in
the ass, much less understand it. Nuff said.

Would you please supply some evidence of your claims?

You failed to respond with a definition of the term. That is proof
that you are an uneducable twit.

Would you please supply some evidence of your achievements?

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:13:12 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:48:06 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:52:31 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

I was system engineering director for several
military satellites systems,

And now you are a withering old **** who comes in here mouthing petty
horse**** about someone as if you know them, when you, in fact, have no
clue about anything about them. What you are doing is jumping on the
petty, immature asshole bandwagon. You are a special case type asswipe.

I tend to judge people by their willingness and abilities to learn new
things.

List the "new things" you or any other ****tard here has ever tried to
instruct me on. Oh... THAT'S RIGHT... YOU CANNOT. You and your petty
jack-offs are total failures.

You fail.

I am fine. You are an idiot who think he can make a valid assessment
based on some other dumb****tard's stupid remarks, taking them as if they
are factual. You are even more pathetic than the retarded ******* who
spouted the lies to begin with.

You may know something about CATV and fiber,

I know a lot about a lot of things. For you to assess the level of my
skills or knowledge based on the stupid horse**** some lame ****tard
spewed in this thread, is more of a tell about your inability than it is
about my abilities.

but it doesn't show.

You're an idiot. Half the ****tards in here don't even know what
Digicipher II is, and you likely don't have much of a grasp of it either,
****head.

Instead of taking the time to educate those whom you suspect of being
in error,

WTF are you attempting to do here, asswipe?

you waste our time with insults and unsubstantiated
opinions.

You are an idiot. The insults go to assholes who have been haranguing
me for years. Every now and then, some completely uniformed retard like
you comes in and makes a stupid assessment based on a single thread.

You are so ****ing stupid, you probably believe the retarded ****s
claiming I am a janitor. IF I were a janitor, 98% of you ****tards would
be in a landfill by now.

Your command of profanity is truly impressive,

You are a goddamned idiot to make any assessment about it at all,
dumb****.

but
misplaced.

That is an opinion. Just like mine that you are about as stupid as it
gets, because you are not informed enough to know what has been taking
place for years here. **** you and your horse blinders, dumb****.

If someone presented you with your comments, what you
would think of the author?

When I was presented with insults years ago, I returned the favor.
The immature retards have yet to stop being the total ****ing retards
that they are, so I will continue pointing out their utter stupidity to
them, and dumb****s like you. You are just too ****ing stupid to see it
for what it is. The Pommy Retard has ALWAYS stalked my posts, and made
stupid remarks, and you are jumping on me for calling him the total piece
of **** that he is?

Have a nice day, Mr Nymbecile. :-)


You are dumber than dog****, boy!

I can't imagine what personal tragedy has occurred in your life,

Idiots like you. That's what happened.

that
you find it necessary to demonstrate your competence

You have no clue as to my competence in any field or endeavor, you
stupid ****. The fact that you use a Usenet post to form your pathetic
assessment says more about your immature stupidity than anything about
me. When will you realize that your ****ing guesses about someone have no
basis in reality?

at the expense of
others.

I would charge you your entire life if I could. Many of you should be
cleared from the gene pool.

If you're truly competent,

Make up your mind, ****HEAD. You are either on the make **** up about
me bandwagon or you are not. Either way, you have already stepped over
the line.

such a crutch is not necessary.

Such opinions about what my motives are, are truly more stupid than the
pother idiots and their petty bull**** jabs.

If
you clean up your act,


I do not have to measure up to your pathetic, unqualified,
unprofessional, unsolicited retarded assessments, IDIOT!

there may be hope for you remaining.

If you were here, there might be hope for you to eat without a straw
after I turned your ****ing jaw sideways. You are pathetic.

Go judge your mother, ****head. She is a criminal bitch for not
flushing you the moment the retarded slut shat your retarded ass.

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 22:19:19 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:15:36 -0800, Jeff Liebermann
wrote:


Correct. I supplied the minimum necessary for you to notice that
there is a problem.

You are too goddamned blind to see WHERE the problem is located.

I have been telling you all there is a problem for years!

Were I to say "Are you all ready to be nice now?" there are always six
or eight who still want to take jabs, and then it ensues again.

You getting it yet?

If you all want to be nice, we can do that, but you can bet someone
will start again, and THEN I will reciprocate. I play by those rules of
engagement. That is why YOU got schmacked. Because you are on the
stupid, snide remark bandwagon too. Character compromises shall not
pass.

So, get started on *them* as well.. and yourself, Jeffy Fixit. Every
time I try to be like anyone else, an army of idiots start with their
sub-Jr High mentality horse****. They will get their plates of **** back
in their faces. Don't you go thinking you can start feeding me one too,
boy. And then some dope thinks that because I cuss, I am wrong from the
start. That is pretty stupid too. Call them "colorful metaphors".

I have the entire archive. Nearly two decades. The names these idiots
use to refer to me with do not match any I have ever used. They can have
that back in their faces. Cussing doesn't mean a ****ing thing. You
getting it yet?

I can chronicle every time each asshole started it, from over a decade
ago in some cases.

Sometimes I feel quite sorry for you, Nymbecile. Can it really be the
case that you don't realise that you are the easiest wind-up ever?

The sad thing is that you can't see when you are being wound-up.

Increasing Cable TV signal strength MoCA
 

" wrote:

On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 13:54:36 -0800, Joerg wrote:

Michael A. Terrell wrote:
Joerg wrote:
Michael A. Terrell wrote:
? Joerg wrote:
?? http://www.cablefax.com/ct/sections/...ier_44237.html
??
?? Quote "The Multimedia Over Coax Alliance (MoCA) provides a standard ..."
??
?? then
??
?? Quote "The maximum cable distance supported between the root and the
?? last outlet is 300 feet, with a maximum attenuation of 25 dB". And this
?? is for MoCA, not just cable TV.
?
?
? MoCA is home networking, hence the 300 foot figure. A drop at +10
? dBmv already allows a 25 dB loss for the cable modem, since they are
? designed to work to -15 dBmv. That webpage also mentions verifing that a
? "drop amplifier does not block Moca". In other words, it's home
? networking for multimedia devices and has nothing to do with the length
? of the cable drop. It is to allow customers to stream audio and video
? within their home, and use services like Netflix ? Hulu on their TV
? sets.
?

It is the modern cable TV, like it or not.


Sigh. You never back down, even when you are shown that you are
wrong.


Because I am not.

http://publicservice.vermont.gov/con...rts_cable.html

Quote "If its under 300 feet, its free to the consumer".

Yes, it is as simple as that. You are within 300ft and the cable company
must serve you. This is state-of-the-art. Now you'll probably declare
the whole State of Vermont to be wrong?

The whole state? Na, there's probably three sane people left.


The FCC says the requirement is 100 feet in CFR 47-46.606, section
three, quoted below:
---
(3) The visual signal level, across a terminating impedance which
correctly matches the internal impedance of the cable system as viewed
from the subscriber terminal, shall not be less than 1 millivolt across
an internal impedance of 75 ohms (0 dBmV). Additionally, as measured at
the end of a 30 meter (100 foot) cable drop that is connected to the
subscriber tap, it shall not be less than 1.41 millivolts across an
internal impedance of 75 ohms (+3 dBmV). (At other impedance values, the
minimum visual signal level, as viewed from the subscriber terminal,
shall be the square root of 0.0133 (Z) millivolts and, as measured at
the end of a 30 meter (100 foot) cable drop that is connected to the
subscriber tap, shall be 2 times the square root of 0.00662(Z)
millivolts, where Z is the appropriate impedance value.)
---


That mess in Vermont involves Adelphia cable, and the settlement of a
huge fraud lawsuit. They agreed to build to a minimum of 14 homes per
mile, when the industry usually stops at 35-40 homes per mile as ever
paying back the construction costs. Vermont had them by the balls, if
they wanted to renew their franchisee. Adelphia is also heavily invested
in FIOS.


The other franchises I looked at only had a 300 foot limit if it was
Fiber to the structure, which doesn't have the roll off and insertion
loss of coax.

Here is a typical RG6 from Belden:

Freq. (MHz) Attenuation (dB/100 ft.)
5 .67
55 1.60
211 2.87
270 3.24
300 3.43
350 3.72
400 4.00
450 4.26
550 4.71
750 5.59
870 6.00
1000 6.54

This shows the loss at 12.78 dB at 450 MHz which would be a very old
system.


--
You can't have a sense of humor, if you have no sense.

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:19:31 +0000, Pomegranate *******
wrote:

Sometimes I feel quite sorry for you, Nymbecile. Can it really be the
case that you don't realise that you are the easiest wind-up ever?

The sad thing is that you can't see when you are being wound-up.

The sad thing is the actual state of mind, and lack of maturity of
those doing it.

And they would call themselves civil.

You are not even in the same boat. Sub-humans don't get to be rated
with us.

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:38:11 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 09:19:31 +0000, Pomegranate *******
wrote:

Sometimes I feel quite sorry for you, Nymbecile. Can it really be the
case that you don't realise that you are the easiest wind-up ever?

The sad thing is that you can't see when you are being wound-up.

The sad thing is the actual state of mind, and lack of maturity of
those doing it.

And they would call themselves civil.

You are not even in the same boat. Sub-humans don't get to be rated
with us.
Who do you mean by "us"?

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:57:06 -0800, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote:

On Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:34:43 -0600, tom wrote:

And I was leading 10M$ engineering projects while you were installing cable.

Yes, and now I am leading $400M (yes, idiot, the dollar sign goes in
front) telecom projects which include spaceborne elements and the fastest
gateways on the planet and put Americans to work all over the nation in
support, and you get to type stupid **** in Usenet and on your facebook
facetard account and wither away like the old, dead **** you are.

Soon enough, you'll be as senile as krw is and you won't even be able
to cut a cable fitting, and I will be still taking cross country tours
and racing on my bike and barefoot water skiing and living until 2110.
Hell, I'll set records. I am just getting started.

Yes, idiot... you are amusing, sometimes. Bwuahahahahahaha!

My, that's a nasty cough, Nymbecile. You should think about seeing a
doctor. Not for the cough but for your mental instability.

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:30:24 -0800 The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote in Message id:
:

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:52:11 -0600, tom wrote:

On 2/10/2012 8:32 PM, Wayne wrote:

He really needs to create a new file from which to cut and paste. Like
most comedians', his jokes get stale after awhile.

-- VWW, K6EVE
-
But you must admit that this normally quiet newsgroup finally has some
activity. Who knows, this could take on the characteristics of the GFW.
--Wayne W5GIE

"GFW=Great Fractal Wars"

Unfortunately the traffic has nothing to do with antennas.

Things dried up here around 6 months ago. I suspect the people with
brains and stories, and some of us remember who they are, are no longer
with us or finally bailed due to the noise.


I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies.

I was reading the CRC handbook at 11 yo.

I was working with fractals before you even knew what they were.

I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies at 15 yo.

Then he woke up with his pin-dick in his hand and sticky fingers. Yuck.

Increasing Cable TV signal strength
 

On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 10:05:03 -0800 The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra
wrote in Message id:
:

On Sat, 11 Feb 2012 09:47:14 -0800, "Wayne"
wrote:



"The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra" wrote in message
. ..

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:52:11 -0600, tom wrote:

On 2/10/2012 8:32 PM, Wayne wrote:

He really needs to create a new file from which to cut and paste. Like
most comedians', his jokes get stale after awhile.

-- VWW, K6EVE
-
But you must admit that this normally quiet newsgroup finally has some
activity. Who knows, this could take on the characteristics of the GFW.
--Wayne W5GIE

"GFW=Great Fractal Wars"

Unfortunately the traffic has nothing to do with antennas.

Things dried up here around 6 months ago. I suspect the people with
brains and stories, and some of us remember who they are, are no longer
with us or finally bailed due to the noise.


I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies.
-
Moonrakers? LOL. Ok now we have you calibrated.

No, you do not. I was 12 years old, and the gear was my dad's.

Message-ID:
"I was playing with Moonrakers way back in the early seventies at 15 yo."

For ****'s sake, can't you at least keep your LIES straight, you utter
****ing imbecile?

tom "k0TAR" shows his immaturity level yet again. What a sad excuse for a man
 

On Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:40:07 -0600 tom wrote in
Message id: :

On 2/10/2012 9:34 PM, The_Giant_Rat_of_Sumatra wrote:
Cut lots of stuff

More pathetic jabbing horse**** from a jerk who actually would like
folks to think he has been making "helpful' comments in a hope to 'aid'
someone. Your bull**** here shows you for the total ****ing retarded
jerk, who jumped onto the retarded jerk bandwagon with the rest of the
retarded jerks. Yer doin real good, boy... NOT!

now that you
mention it, and is trying to compensate for his lack of success and low
IQ with insults.

I did more in the last week to make the world a better place than you
will in your entire pathetic life, boy.

Usenet. You gotta love the kooks.

Go back to the kook group, you retarded ****. You will never be loved,
because you are too retarded to even know what love is.

tom
K0TAR A complete and utter retard.

He really likes the word "retard".

Wonder why?

He also loves fecal references. An expert in Scatology.