"Irv Finkleman" napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
Do you realize you are getting led down the garden path? I've been
following his participation (if you can call it that) in various
discussions
for quite some time. I don't think he even as a license.

A few days ago i wrote:
" I have never seen a transmitter (even that in a mobile phone).
S*

He can almost
always be counted upon to totally disrupt an intelligent thread with
stupid questions and will continue to do so as long as he can suck
in a few responses.

I asked:
"Tesla coil circuits were used commercially in sparkgap radio transmitters
for wireless telegraphy until the 1920s,[1"
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRSSTC

But in 1929 was wrote: "It is not generally appreciated that this curious
apparatus, often associated with pretty or spectacular demonstrations of
high voltage electricity, is really a fundamental part of modern radio. For
all the tuning apparatus and circuits in every transmitting and receiving
set are simply variations of Tesla coils and Tesla coil circuits".
From: http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1929-09-22.htm

Now is 2012. Is " this curious apparatus" the "fundamental part of modern
radio"? Of course in form of the " variations of Tesla coils and Tesla
coil circuits".
S* "

Now I know the opinions of radio amateurs.

Just ignore him for a while and he'll go away.

Sometimes I must ask the experts.
What is wrong in that?
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:


Now is 2012. Is " this curious apparatus" the "fundamental part of modern
radio"? Of course in form of the " variations of Tesla coils and Tesla
coil circuits".
S* "

Asked and answered.

NO.

Tesla coils have not been part of ANY transmitter built since before WWII.

Tesla coils have not been part of ANY transmitter built since before WWII.

Tesla coils have not been part of ANY transmitter built since before WWII.

Sometimes I must ask the experts.
What is wrong in that?
S*

You are a babbling idiot and can't understand a simple answer even if it
is spoon fed to you.

On 4/10/2012 3:16 AM, Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Sometimes I must ask the experts.
What is wrong in that?
S*

In principle a good idea. The problem is you never, ever, ever believe
what they say. You continue to blather the often incorrect 100 year old
crap you fond on wikipedia.

I too am tired of this idiot.

PLONK!

tom
K0TAR