![]() |
Electron gun
In message , Jeff
writes On 17/04/2012 04:41, wrote: wrote: snip He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now. He has been doing it for many years now. He does not misunderstand English. With all his years of posting, one would have expected his English to have improved over the years; it hasn't. That alone should be an indicator. I am sure that everyone realises that he is a Troll, but it is fun watching the ever increasing ludicrousness of his arguments and him not realising that the Troll is himself being Trolled. His play-stupidity is indeed extremely inventive. There doesn't seem to be anything that he can't mis-understand so well. -- Ian |
Electron gun
"Jeff" wrote in message
... I am sure that everyone realises that he is a Troll, but it is fun watching the ever increasing ludicrousness of his arguments and him not realising that the Troll is himself being Trolled. Jeff Hello Jeff. I agree. It's nice to see there are some patient and helpful people on this NG who have tried to help S. I'm speculating on what sort of person he really is .. then I smile to myself when I see his circular arguments. I wonder what would happen if we posted items about him but didn't reply to his postings (similar to the "we're talking about you, not to you" behaviour". I'll tell you one thing - the discussion about antennas has been very interesting so it's made the NG live up to its name. 73, Ian. |
Electron gun
"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: Where you learned that no field electron emission? S* We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes a problem, like Tesla did. The field electrons emission take place at each voltage. S* |
Electron gun
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Uzytkownik "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci ... Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must be completely wrong"... I read that now: And obviously did not understand it. snip quote Is the field electron emission from the tip top of antenna or not? No. Where you learned that no field electron emission? Where you learned badder such Englishes? |
Electron gun
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: Where you learned that no field electron emission? S* We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes a problem, like Tesla did. The field electrons emission take place at each voltage. No. You did not read the material. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_electron_emission "Field emission in pure metals occurs in high electric fields: the gradients are typically higher than 1 gigavolt per metre and strongly dependent upon the work function." Do you have any clue what it takes to get a gradient of 1 gigavolt per metre? |
Electron gun
napisał w wiadomości ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: Where you learned that no field electron emission? S* We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes a problem, like Tesla did. The field electrons emission take place at each voltage. No. You did not read the material. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_electron_emission "Field emission in pure metals occurs in high electric fields: the gradients are typically higher than 1 gigavolt per metre and strongly dependent upon the work function." It contradicts to the known phenomenon that each charged body lost its charge in a short time. AT EACH VOLTAGE. S* |
Electron gun
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
napisa? w wiadomo?ci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: Where you learned that no field electron emission? S* We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes a problem, like Tesla did. The field electrons emission take place at each voltage. No. You did not read the material. From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_electron_emission "Field emission in pure metals occurs in high electric fields: the gradients are typically higher than 1 gigavolt per metre and strongly dependent upon the work function." It contradicts to the known phenomenon that each charged body lost its charge in a short time. AT EACH VOLTAGE. Pure, nonsensical, gibberish. You are a babbling idiot. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:23 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com