"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
.. .

In all answers no clear information if your "black box" have the
earth/chassis/counterpoise.

Have you looked at any of the books I mentioned in an earlier posting,
please?

I know what is in the books. I do not know if your ""black box" have the
earth/chassis/counterpoise."
Best Regards,
S*

Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.

On 4/16/2012 2:56 AM, Ian wrote:


Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.



Ian

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He does not misunderstand English.

tom
K0TAR

tom wrote:

snip

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He has been doing it for many years now.

He does not misunderstand English.

With all his years of posting, one would have expected his English to
have improved over the years; it hasn't.

That alone should be an indicator.

In message , Jeff
writes
On 17/04/2012 04:41, wrote:
wrote:

snip

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He has been doing it for many years now.

He does not misunderstand English.

With all his years of posting, one would have expected his English to
have improved over the years; it hasn't.

That alone should be an indicator.


I am sure that everyone realises that he is a Troll, but it is fun
watching the ever increasing ludicrousness of his arguments and him not
realising that the Troll is himself being Trolled.

His play-stupidity is indeed extremely inventive. There doesn't seem to
be anything that he can't mis-understand so well.
--
Ian

"Jeff" wrote in message
...


I am sure that everyone realises that he is a Troll, but it is fun
watching the ever increasing ludicrousness of his arguments and him not
realising that the Troll is himself being Trolled.

Jeff

Hello Jeff.

I agree. It's nice to see there are some patient and helpful people on this
NG who have tried to help S. I'm speculating on what sort of person he
really is .. then I smile to myself when I see his circular arguments. I
wonder what would happen if we posted items about him but didn't reply to
his postings (similar to the "we're talking about you, not to you"
behaviour".

I'll tell you one thing - the discussion about antennas has been very
interesting so it's made the NG live up to its name.

73, Ian.

In message , tom
writes
On 4/16/2012 2:56 AM, Ian wrote:


Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.



Ian

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He does not misunderstand English.

I think he's the same guy who, for several years, has been posting
similar nonsense in various newsgroups. The script is usually similar,
typically "I have only a very basic knowledge of physics, but I know
that Einstein was completely wrong about his theory of relativity".
--
Ian

Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , tom
writes
On 4/16/2012 2:56 AM, Ian wrote:


Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.



Ian

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He does not misunderstand English.

I think he's the same guy who, for several years, has been posting
similar nonsense in various newsgroups. The script is usually similar,
typically "I have only a very basic knowledge of physics, but I know
that Einstein was completely wrong about his theory of relativity".

Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result
was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must
be completely wrong"...

Uzytkownik "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...

Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result
was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must
be completely wrong"...

I read that now:

""A further feature of the structure of negative coronas is that as the
electrons drift outwards, they encounter neutral molecules and,
withelectronegative molecules (such as oxygen and water vapor), combine to
produce negative ions. These negative ions are then attracted to the
positive uncurved electrode, completing the 'circuit'.". From: Negative
coronas. Mechanism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_...gative_coronas

""The difference, then, between positive and negative coronas, in the matter
of the generation of secondary electron avalanches, is that in a positive
corona they are generated by the gas surrounding the plasma region, the new
secondary electrons travelling inward, whereas in a negative corona they are
generated by the curved electrode itself, the new secondary electrons
travelling outward."

"in a negative corona the electrons are generated by the curved electrode
itself".

Is the field electron emission from the tip top of antenna or not?

Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

So it does not apply to amateur radio antennas.

"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

The field electrons emission take place at each voltage.
S*