Ian Jackson wrote:
In message , tom
writes
On 4/16/2012 2:56 AM, Ian wrote:


Good morning Szczepan.

I think we have a language problem here. The answers to your questions ARE
in the books that I mentioned. If these books are not available in your
native language then I can understand your difficulties.

I recommended the amateur radio books because they cater for people who have
no prior knowledge of radio and aerials.I still haven't seen an answer from
you to my question "Are you discussing resonant or non-resonant aerials,
please?".

Kindest regards, Ian.



Ian

He is a troll. He has been doing this for almost a year now.

He does not misunderstand English.

I think he's the same guy who, for several years, has been posting
similar nonsense in various newsgroups. The script is usually similar,
typically "I have only a very basic knowledge of physics, but I know
that Einstein was completely wrong about his theory of relativity".

Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result
was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must
be completely wrong"...

Uzytkownik "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...

Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result
was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must
be completely wrong"...

I read that now:

""A further feature of the structure of negative coronas is that as the
electrons drift outwards, they encounter neutral molecules and,
withelectronegative molecules (such as oxygen and water vapor), combine to
produce negative ions. These negative ions are then attracted to the
positive uncurved electrode, completing the 'circuit'.". From: Negative
coronas. Mechanism.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corona_...gative_coronas

""The difference, then, between positive and negative coronas, in the matter
of the generation of secondary electron avalanches, is that in a positive
corona they are generated by the gas surrounding the plasma region, the new
secondary electrons travelling inward, whereas in a negative corona they are
generated by the curved electrode itself, the new secondary electrons
travelling outward."

"in a negative corona the electrons are generated by the curved electrode
itself".

Is the field electron emission from the tip top of antenna or not?

Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

So it does not apply to amateur radio antennas.

"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

The field electrons emission take place at each voltage.
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

The field electrons emission take place at each voltage.

No.

You did not read the material.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_electron_emission

"Field emission in pure metals occurs in high electric fields: the gradients
are typically higher than 1 gigavolt per metre and strongly dependent upon
the work function."

Do you have any clue what it takes to get a gradient of 1 gigavolt per metre?

napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

The field electrons emission take place at each voltage.

No.

You did not read the material.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_electron_emission

"Field emission in pure metals occurs in high electric fields: the
gradients
are typically higher than 1 gigavolt per metre and strongly dependent upon
the work function."

It contradicts to the known phenomenon that each charged body lost its
charge in a short time. AT EACH VOLTAGE.
S*

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

napisa? w wiadomo?ci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Where you learned that no field electron emission?
S*

We don't operate our antennas in the voltage range where that becomes
a problem, like Tesla did.

The field electrons emission take place at each voltage.

No.

You did not read the material.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Field_electron_emission

"Field emission in pure metals occurs in high electric fields: the
gradients
are typically higher than 1 gigavolt per metre and strongly dependent upon
the work function."

It contradicts to the known phenomenon that each charged body lost its
charge in a short time. AT EACH VOLTAGE.

Pure, nonsensical, gibberish.

You are a babbling idiot.

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Uzytkownik "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...

Well, this one usually goed more like "I read that in 1910 this result
was found in experiments, so everything we learned after that must
be completely wrong"...

I read that now:

And obviously did not understand it.

snip quote

Is the field electron emission from the tip top of antenna or not?

No.

Where you learned that no field electron emission?

Where you learned badder such Englishes?