Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 24th 12, 08:36 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 707
Default Autoelectronic emission


"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


Counterpoise is exactly like underground "ground". But if the soil is dry
sand or the rock there no free electrons. It is better to place the
conductors in the air.


But they are not connected to a source of free electrons, so if those
would be required they would be depleted pretty quickly.


Air is not perfect insulator. Counterpoise has a big surface.


Where the voltage is there must be the electron emission.

Experiments with the photoelectric effect shown that no current below
10V.
But it apply to the flat cathode.
If the cathode is a wire the voltage is lower.

And what is with your antenna in sunny day?
S*


Even if there are a couple of electrons that jump off the antenna,
it is not going to cause a measurable effect. You need more than a
couple of electrons to have a measurable current, and it is not going
to happen at those voltages and daylight conditions.


The selfcapacitance of an antenna is very small. You need a couple of
electrons to have a measurable static voltage.
For this reason the earth/chassis/counterpoise is necessary.
S*


  #2   Report Post  
Old April 24th 12, 10:42 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Default Autoelectronic emission


"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...


"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


The selfcapacitance of an antenna is very small. You need a couple of
electrons to have a measurable static voltage.
For this reason the earth/chassis/counterpoise is necessary.
S*


Hello Szczepan.
A dipole aerial doesn't need a counterpoise nor does it need any connection
to earth/ground/counterpoise.

I've kept quiet during the discussion because I don't think of my radio and
aerial in terms of sub-atomic particles. For me, resonance, impendance and
SWR are more significant.

Have you considered taking your theories / discussions /
cutting-and-pastings about sub-atomic particles and other kindred items to
one of the physics newsgroups such as:
alt.sci.amateur
alt.sci.physics
sci.physics
I'd expect that you will find lots of people with whom you can discuss the
behaviour of sub-atomic particles.

Kindest regards, Ian.


  #3   Report Post  
Old April 24th 12, 06:13 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 707
Default Autoelectronic emission


"Ian" napisa³ w wiadomo¶ci
...

"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...


"Rob" napisal w wiadomosci
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


The selfcapacitance of an antenna is very small. You need a couple of
electrons to have a measurable static voltage.
For this reason the earth/chassis/counterpoise is necessary.
S*


Hello Szczepan.
A dipole aerial doesn't need a counterpoise nor does it need any
connection to earth/ground/counterpoise.


Is it your transmitter:
http://rf.circuitlab.org/2011/06/80m...e-antenna.html
?

I've kept quiet during the discussion because I don't think of my radio
and aerial in terms of sub-atomic particles. For me, resonance, impendance
and SWR are more significant.


Your dipole are exactly like the two Kundt's tube. There are "resonance,
impendance and SWR". To demonstrate of the SWR the tube end must be porous.
Air molecules work like the electrons.

Have you considered taking your theories / discussions /
cutting-and-pastings about sub-atomic particles and other kindred items to
one of the physics newsgroups such as:
alt.sci.amateur
alt.sci.physics
sci.physics
I'd expect that you will find lots of people with whom you can discuss the
behaviour of sub-atomic particles.


Electrons are the subatomic particles.
Radio is the only field where "plumber analogy" is totaly inadequate.

Kindest regards,
S*


  #4   Report Post  
Old April 24th 12, 07:16 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Apr 2012
Posts: 165
Default Autoelectronic emission

"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
.. .
Is it your transmitter:
http://rf.circuitlab.org/2011/06/80m...e-antenna.html



Definitely not. That's a full wave aerial. It's an FM transmitter. I use SSB
and CW.

Your dipole are exactly like the two Kundt's tube. There are "resonance,
impendance and SWR". To demonstrate of the SWR the tube end must be
porous.
Air molecules work like the electrons.


The ends of my aerials are not porous.
According to Wikipedia, Kundt's tubes are used to measure the speed of sound
in a gas or solid rod.

Have you considered taking your theories / discussions /
cutting-and-pastings about sub-atomic particles and other kindred items to
one of the physics newsgroups such as:
alt.sci.amateur
alt.sci.physics
sci.physics
I'd expect that you will find lots of people with whom you can discuss the
behaviour of sub-atomic particles.


  #5   Report Post  
Old April 24th 12, 08:10 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Autoelectronic emission

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Is it your transmitter:
http://rf.circuitlab.org/2011/06/80m...e-antenna.html



You are so stupid you can't even understand a picture, you stupid idiot.


snip remaining stupid babble




  #6   Report Post  
Old April 24th 12, 08:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,898
Default Autoelectronic emission

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Air is not perfect insulator. Counterpoise has a big surface.


No such thing happens, you stupid, stupid person.

snip remaining stupid babble


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carbon Emission Regulations to be Used as Censorship Tool Chas. Chan Shortwave 0 July 12th 09 01:24 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017