Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Autoelectronic emission
"Ian" napisał w wiadomości ... "Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message ... "Rob" napisal w wiadomosci ... Szczepan Bialek wrote: The selfcapacitance of an antenna is very small. You need a couple of electrons to have a measurable static voltage. For this reason the earth/chassis/counterpoise is necessary. S* Hello Szczepan. A dipole aerial doesn't need a counterpoise nor does it need any connection to earth/ground/counterpoise. Is it your transmitter: http://rf.circuitlab.org/2011/06/80m...e-antenna.html ? I've kept quiet during the discussion because I don't think of my radio and aerial in terms of sub-atomic particles. For me, resonance, impendance and SWR are more significant. Your dipole are exactly like the two Kundt's tube. There are "resonance, impendance and SWR". To demonstrate of the SWR the tube end must be porous. Air molecules work like the electrons. Have you considered taking your theories / discussions / cutting-and-pastings about sub-atomic particles and other kindred items to one of the physics newsgroups such as: alt.sci.amateur alt.sci.physics sci.physics I'd expect that you will find lots of people with whom you can discuss the behaviour of sub-atomic particles. Electrons are the subatomic particles. Radio is the only field where "plumber analogy" is totaly inadequate. Kindest regards, S* |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Autoelectronic emission
"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
.. . Is it your transmitter: http://rf.circuitlab.org/2011/06/80m...e-antenna.html Definitely not. That's a full wave aerial. It's an FM transmitter. I use SSB and CW. Your dipole are exactly like the two Kundt's tube. There are "resonance, impendance and SWR". To demonstrate of the SWR the tube end must be porous. Air molecules work like the electrons. The ends of my aerials are not porous. According to Wikipedia, Kundt's tubes are used to measure the speed of sound in a gas or solid rod. Have you considered taking your theories / discussions / cutting-and-pastings about sub-atomic particles and other kindred items to one of the physics newsgroups such as: alt.sci.amateur alt.sci.physics sci.physics I'd expect that you will find lots of people with whom you can discuss the behaviour of sub-atomic particles. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Autoelectronic emission
Szczepan Bialek wrote:
Is it your transmitter: http://rf.circuitlab.org/2011/06/80m...e-antenna.html You are so stupid you can't even understand a picture, you stupid idiot. snip remaining stupid babble |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Carbon Emission Regulations to be Used as Censorship Tool | Shortwave |