Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7/3/2012 6:15 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:
"NM5K" wrote in message ... But I really don't care for contest/field day type of operating all that much. snip But generally, my idea of "field day" is kicking back in one of my lawn chairs, sipping on a cold adult beverage, and talking to all those good ole buoys on 75 or 40... :/ I'm headed that way, myself. This FD was no fun. I used to look forward to it. I was so busy making sure that I met all my responsibilities, I found only a few hours to actually operate. This came after all the prep work, worry and concern, including getting an all-electronic network log running. (That our network logging worked perfectly in no way makes up for my having had trouble sleeping for weeks leading up to FD.) Next year, this job goes to somebody else. "Sal" (KD6VKW) FD can be a lot of work. I know dragging a tower and beam out there got to be a tad strenuous. And I rarely used the thing myself.. I string up dipoles for me, which is pretty easy to deal with. But even with an easy setup, I still don't care for contest type operating all that much. Just not really my cup of java.. I skipped this year again. Too busy with work, even if I wanted to go. If I do any more in the future, like I say, I'll probably just hang out on my own property. That way I can operate at a leisurely pace, and if I get burned out, I can just quit and go do something else for a while. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NM5K" wrote in message ... FD can be a lot of work. I know dragging a tower and beam out there got to be a tad strenuous. And I rarely used the thing myself.. I string up dipoles for me, which is pretty easy to deal with. But even with an easy setup, I still don't care for contest type operating all that much. Just not really my cup of java.. I skipped this year again. Too busy with work, even if I wanted to go. If I do any more in the future, like I say, I'll probably just hang out on my own property. That way I can operate at a leisurely pace, and if I get burned out, I can just quit and go do something else for a while. Amen to that! Last year, I put up three 30-foot poles to support a 20m dipole at its optimum height. This year, I thought I was gettting off easy with just one pole. Maybe so, but with the top section having a crossarm and the extra weight of the elements and tethers, getting that sucker up the same 30 feet was still an adventure. I'm thinking of something simpler next year and not ruling out being a home station for the first time ever. "Sal" |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 2:55:03 PM UTC-7, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:
"NM5K" wrote in message ... FD can be a lot of work. I know dragging a tower and beam out there got to be a tad strenuous. And I rarely used the thing myself.. I string up dipoles for me, which is pretty easy to deal with. But even with an easy setup, I still don't care for contest type operating all that much. Just not really my cup of java.. I skipped this year again. Too busy with work, even if I wanted to go. If I do any more in the future, like I say, I'll probably just hang out on my own property. That way I can operate at a leisurely pace, and if I get burned out, I can just quit and go do something else for a while. Amen to that! Last year, I put up three 30-foot poles to support a 20m dipole at its optimum height. This year, I thought I was gettting off easy with just one pole. Maybe so, but with the top section having a crossarm and the extra weight of the elements and tethers, getting that sucker up the same 30 feet was still an adventure. I'm thinking of something simpler next year and not ruling out being a home station for the first time ever. "Sal" This is Sal again. I don't know where my login data went. I dropped out as club FD Chairman. It wasn't fun any more. I was so happy when I assembled the last of the material I needed to report to ARRL. "Sal" |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/10/2012 1:25 AM, NM5K wrote:
I plan to go back up there around the end of October. One reason I think it was squirrels, is they had been eating off areas of coax jacket in the past.. I'd have to wrap chewed up areas with electrical tape to keep the water out. I may have to coat my coax with something squirrels don't like. ![]() Coat it with dead squirrels. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NM5K" wrote in message ... On 9/10/2012 12:14 AM, wrote: ... the coax was pretty much gone.. It started raining, so I left before I could do more investigating.. At first I thought someone stole it.. But then I noticed random pieces of coax laying on the ground.. I think critters, probably squirrels, must have ate it.. I'll have to look more when I'm back up there later.. But I know I'm going to have to redo everything, including new coax if I want to continue to jibber jabber on the radio when I'm there. I plan to go back up there around the end of October. One reason I think it was squirrels, is they had been eating off areas of coax jacket in the past.. I'd have to wrap chewed up areas with electrical tape to keep the water out. I may have to coat my coax with something squirrels don't like. ![]() Depending on the distance (which might mean an unacceptable added expense), you could run PVC. I put in a 10 ft satellite dish in the mid 1980's, running all the cables in PVC because they needed to be buried for appearance. (The stuff was called "direct burial, but ... I'm a skeptic.) The point is that it was still fine after about two decades when I decommissioned it about five years ago in favor of digital cable. Both ends opened down to keep moisture from dribbling in but yet letting the inside "breathe" with temperature changes. One caution: Just because the cable fits into the coax, you may not be able to pull the whole length due to internal drag friction. I had to cut my PVC and thread the cables throught the first section, then a PVC union and then the second section. Finally, I glued the cut ends into to the union. If you use big enough PVC, you won't have my problem. "Sal" (KD6VKW) "Vicious Killer Weasel" |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/12/2012 6:54 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote:
Depending on the distance (which might mean an unacceptable added expense), you could run PVC. I don't think that would work.. The coax is not running to a building or anything. I was feeding 80/40 dipoles, with the feed point between two oak trees, and the coax led over to one of the trees. I'd just run it out to wherever I was operating, usually my stone bench. I had about 100 feet of RG-58.. When I left, I'd just roll the coax up and hang it on a tree branch. I got about 5 years out of that setup before the coax went kaput. One thing I might consider is installing a box or something to store the bulk of the rolled up coax away from critters. They still would be able to eat on the part leading to the antenna, but at least the bulk of it would be fairly safe. What was weird this time was none of the rolled up coax was hanging on the tree, and it was broke or unconnected from the antenna, and only a few little pieces on the ground. Some varmint might have dragged it off into the woods, but like I say, it started raining. So I left, and will have to look for other pieces when I go back up there. Someone may have stolen the bulk of it.. But I expect it's all basically ruined, so I will be needing to replace it all. Luckily I use only the thin stuff there, so cheaper than buying the usual 213 that I use here at the house. 213 is direct burial.. But it's too heavy for what I'm doing up there. Too pricy to leave out also, being it's basically thief bait hanging on the tree branch. I haven't bought any coax in a few years, and expect sticker shock due to the price of copper these days. I've got lots of spare runs of RG-8, but not sure if I have any rg-58 left or not.. Like I say, the RG-8/213 is too heavy, even if I wanted to risk leaving it there. I'd also have to rewire the antennas with thicker wire to support that heavy stuff and be able to keep tension on the antenna wires to avoid the droops. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "NM5K" wrote in message ... On 9/12/2012 6:54 PM, Sal M. O'Nella wrote: Depending on the distance (which might mean an unacceptable added expense), you could run PVC. I don't think that would work.. The coax is not running to a building or anything. I was feeding 80/40 dipoles, with the feed point between two oak trees, and the coax led over to one of the trees. I'd just run it out to wherever I was operating, usually my stone bench. I had about 100 feet of RG-58.. When I left, I'd just roll the coax up and hang it on a tree branch. I got about 5 years out of that setup before the coax went kaput. One thing I might consider is installing a box or something to store the bulk of the rolled up coax away from critters. They still would be able to eat on the part leading to the antenna, but at least the bulk of it would be fairly safe. What was weird this time was none of the rolled up coax was hanging on the tree, and it was broke or unconnected from the antenna, and only a few little pieces on the ground. Some varmint might have dragged it off into the woods, but like I say, it started raining. So I left, and will have to look for other pieces when I go back up there. Someone may have stolen the bulk of it.. But I expect it's all basically ruined, so I will be needing to replace it all. Luckily I use only the thin stuff there, so cheaper than buying the usual 213 that I use here at the house. 213 is direct burial.. But it's too heavy for what I'm doing up there. Too pricy to leave out also, being it's basically thief bait hanging on the tree branch. I haven't bought any coax in a few years, and expect sticker shock due to the price of copper these days. I've got lots of spare runs of RG-8, but not sure if I have any rg-58 left or not.. Like I say, the RG-8/213 is too heavy, even if I wanted to risk leaving it there. I'd also have to rewire the antennas with thicker wire to support that heavy stuff and be able to keep tension on the antenna wires to avoid the droops. I agree. However, you might approach "droop" in other ways. Depending on the height at which you want to place the feed, you could potentially add a non-conductive span of nylon line above, supporting the weight of a heavier coax. (I have several "quick rigs" for dipoles; one of them includes a span line with pulleys along the line. One I get the span line up, I can begin to haul conductors aloft with other line. Reduced element stress.) The success of this depends on how tall the trees are and how easy/difficult it is to get into them. 73, "Sal" |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Near field vs Far field measurements at 2M | Antenna | |||
Quad for CB use | CB | |||
Quad for CB use | CB | |||
WANT : large QUAD hubs for 40m QUAD | Swap |