RadioBanter - Two QRP HF beacons, One antenna

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"Ralph Mowery" napisa? w wiadomo?ci
m...

"Audio1" wrote in message
...
Hello, and I would just add that while hams tend to use "duplexer" a lot
of others use "diplexer". Just something to keep in mind for Google et
al searches. Sincerely, and 73s from N4GGO,

They're different animals,

http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedia/diplexers.cfm
http://www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedia/duplexers.cfm

Not picking on you, but here we go again with that damn diplexer\duplexer
thing. Even the people that make them will sometimes call the diplexer a
duplexer. Just look at the ads in the ham catalogs. I do know the
differance, but the terms have been used wrong so much that it is no use
trying to correct them here.

Maybe we can get Szczepan Bialek to chime in here so the thread can reach
about 50 messages about the differance.

For me it is enough the difference Hertz dipole/radio amateur dipole.
"diplexer\duplexer" continue without me.

Anyway, do you know the difference Hertz dipole/radio amateur dipole"

S*

There is not such thing a "radio amateur dipole", you babbling idiot.

A dipole is a dipole whether it is used by a radio amateur or a Tibetan
monk.

You are an ignorant, babbling, ineducable idiot who knows absolutely
NOTHING about antennas or how they work, or anything else for that
matter.

How many antennas have you built in your lifetime?

Why do you refuse to answer the question?

Is it because you have built zero antennas and you are trying to say all
the people that have successfully built hundreds that they are all wrong
and you don't want to admit you are an ignorant, inducable, idiot?

Why can't you obtain and read a university level textbook on electromagntics
in any language?

Is it because you are too stupid to be able to understand the material?